Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.7 021/112] soc: ti: omap-prm: use atomic iopoll instead of sleeping one
Date:   Tue,  7 Jul 2020 17:16:26 +0200
Message-Id: <20200707145801.997136149@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200707145800.925304888@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20200707145800.925304888@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.66
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>

[ Upstream commit 98ece19f247159a51003796ede7112fef2df5d7f ]

The reset handling APIs for omap-prm can be invoked PM runtime which
runs in atomic context. For this to work properly, switch to atomic
iopoll version instead of the current which can sleep. Otherwise,
this throws a "BUG: scheduling while atomic" warning. Issue is seen
rather easily when CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled.

Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c b/drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c
index 96c6f777519c0..c9b3f9ebf0bbf 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/ti/omap_prm.c
@@ -256,10 +256,10 @@ static int omap_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
 		goto exit;
 
 	/* wait for the status to be set */
-	ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(reset->prm->base +
-					 reset->prm->data->rstst,
-					 v, v & BIT(st_bit), 1,
-					 OMAP_RESET_MAX_WAIT);
+	ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(reset->prm->base +
+						 reset->prm->data->rstst,
+						 v, v & BIT(st_bit), 1,
+						 OMAP_RESET_MAX_WAIT);
 	if (ret)
 		pr_err("%s: timedout waiting for %s:%lu\n", __func__,
 		       reset->prm->data->name, id);
-- 
2.25.1