Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp1193020ybt; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 09:44:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyqE3DjnyE5i6hlvfAIfOMKwo7S43yIUp+HvchwmjX27Ct+dtJ0Skzh6JNQGkyIfT7TOpdV X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3049:: with SMTP id bu9mr49382823edb.232.1594140249570; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 09:44:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594140249; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=b8dCihL77xl2QoaAf4YVsg7veaKhNt97jO20TH68FU5Os8eJ70CJhuiX2XiViqEcvN javbjhqGfNm010hlgckVpm4AGPjmkryDF3b1CRV2JPoc374Bf7EygXZqht+JTlIp7dCu XIRLIVhtruZwQMTTLT/1pC1/fHY2YMEwMOb9L1AbwAS/fcteEQjkIExg7KKAAonjnxGE ePaE2cw8c+xVNSEEyJslkJKq30WEUWUg6YsghAKTOKIXfDbYZnGw5TC2+rEajBDaCj4O 8BLX97BP0b6pFRpD5XcmRPDgexEbsKGKEwH8YE/89IadC5Ys1V9yA/p56TK91ocmk3sK ueAw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:from:references:cc:to:subject:ironport-sdr :ironport-sdr; bh=gMPw2OKrzXJxecgavNsjeWBgfrulig6zqv8Svg/Pm44=; b=j9yLprb1gMSN39XhZA8XlcyzXJ5gY80ope9XLUVIldqhMSAhFlSwutyeTg3mmVy/lr UCsxQ4Tg9+hhCZb94souMvSs2O/WJTkrKJysQxi25x3Q9+hpdV9YrYciZPDaUPJnSoMI dhSWLpOG6Cma/zfgq3m1fnrUg+WVg6squPlNEGmGrET/6U2VKOi9FfZ69dm0akK9SP5J L9zw/504U3khxuqmkh2dIXqhI5wHDuY0VhPQGR15foTfuP7Sr299NLf/NSO8hoLA5KZN 4cGwlA6p0fznC6+lGxr4DP2U8hwWLsyhOAAtC48TYeo45c6B6vwZcsS7Red02XSjeZyO nJ6A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s21si17821929edi.268.2020.07.07.09.43.46; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 09:44:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728362AbgGGQng (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 12:43:36 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:56936 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728164AbgGGQnd (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 12:43:33 -0400 IronPort-SDR: vwEPATn9OEm6bJy6J7o8z0/VIHXzivsVaGdPL49QbqJBVA+AWYzCyMVHb4aaeceqQKw0xA5mqa FyOxlj/HEBpw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9675"; a="212602699" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,324,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="212602699" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Jul 2020 09:43:32 -0700 IronPort-SDR: oQJ/tEihpDHExqAfyy+Cnpez1MU6oJYlK9ZIkEtPwN0yIGIoumosSVlUET8NOTFm5yQnJ1Xoys KKPo4owxLmCw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,324,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="314370861" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Jul 2020 09:43:31 -0700 Received: from [10.249.228.33] (abudanko-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com [10.249.228.33]) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7379458033E; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 09:43:29 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 11/15] perf stat: implement control commands handling To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , Alexander Shishkin , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel References: <21669f5a-6220-df0a-09f1-b73b32487f23@linux.intel.com> <20200706123436.GD3401866@krava> <6cf91811-ea6a-3c7c-8bbf-7f96bfa1fc82@linux.intel.com> <20200706193418.GB3424581@krava> <20200707131403.GD3424581@krava> <865ad42a-6085-41d6-06d5-730cb9904ce8@linux.intel.com> <20200707142351.GE3424581@krava> <44f494d6-b4a5-2d56-001e-b3289cbeedaa@linux.intel.com> <20200707160524.GA3524217@krava> From: Alexey Budankov Organization: Intel Corp. Message-ID: <1a996f82-edce-1a27-2dda-5f162e358cfe@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 19:43:28 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200707160524.GA3524217@krava> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07.07.2020 19:05, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 05:55:14PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote: > > SNIP > >> process_evlist() now looks suboptimal since record mode code directly calls evlist__ctlfd_process() >> and then handles returned command specifically to the mode. So in v10 I replaced process_evlist() >> call with direct evlist__ctlfd_process() call and then handling the returned command by printing >> command msg tag and counter values in the required order. Like this: >> >> + clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &time_start); >> + if (!(evlist__poll(evsel_list, time_to_sleep) > 0)) { /* poll timeout or EINTR */ >> + if (timeout) >> + break; >> + else >> + stop = handle_interval(interval, times); >> + time_to_sleep = sleep_time; >> + } else { /* fd revent */ >> + if (evlist__ctlfd_process(evsel_list, &cmd) > 0) { >> + if (interval) { >> + switch (cmd) { >> + case EVLIST_CTL_CMD_ENABLE: >> + pr_info(EVLIST_ENABLED_MSG); >> + process_interval(); >> + break; >> + case EVLIST_CTL_CMD_DISABLE: >> + process_interval(); >> + pr_info(EVLIST_DISABLED_MSG); >> + break; >> + case EVLIST_CTL_CMD_ACK: >> + case EVLIST_CTL_CMD_UNSUPPORTED: >> + default: >> + break; >> + } >> + } >> + } >> + clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &time_stop); >> + compute_tts(&time_start, &time_stop, &time_to_sleep); >> + } > > > hum, why not just get the bool from process_evlist like below? Yes, also possible and works. However it checks twice to implement parts of logically the same work and passes the result using extra memory: switch/case at process_evlist(), 'if' at dispatch_events(), dispatch_events() should also call process_interval() instead of handle_interval() to avoid wasting of times counter for commands. Alexey > > jirka > > > --- > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c > index 5021f7286422..32dd3de93f35 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c > @@ -485,20 +485,20 @@ static bool handle_interval(unsigned int interval, int *times) > return false; > } > > -static bool process_evlist(struct evlist *evlist, unsigned int interval, int *times) > +static bool process_evlist(struct evlist *evlist) > { > - bool stop = false; > enum evlist_ctl_cmd cmd = EVLIST_CTL_CMD_UNSUPPORTED; > + bool display = false; > > if (evlist__ctlfd_process(evlist, &cmd) > 0) { > switch (cmd) { > case EVLIST_CTL_CMD_ENABLE: > pr_info(EVLIST_ENABLED_MSG); > - stop = handle_interval(interval, times); > + display = true; > break; > case EVLIST_CTL_CMD_DISABLE: > - stop = handle_interval(interval, times); > pr_info(EVLIST_DISABLED_MSG); > + display = true; > break; > case EVLIST_CTL_CMD_ACK: > case EVLIST_CTL_CMD_UNSUPPORTED: > @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ static bool process_evlist(struct evlist *evlist, unsigned int interval, int *ti > } > } > > - return stop; > + return display; > } > > static void enable_counters(void) > @@ -618,7 +618,8 @@ static int dispatch_events(bool forks, int timeout, int interval, int *times) > stop = handle_interval(interval, times); > time_to_sleep = sleep_time; > } else { /* fd revent */ > - stop = process_evlist(evsel_list, interval, times); > + if (process_evlist(evsel_list)) > + stop = handle_interval(interval, times); > clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &time_stop); > diff_timespec(&time_diff, &time_stop, &time_start); > time_to_sleep -= time_diff.tv_sec * MSEC_PER_SEC + >