Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 7 Jul 2020 13:31:26 -0400
From:   "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 35/65] nfsd: clients dont need to break their own
 delegations
Message-ID: <20200707173126.GE171624@pick.fieldses.org>
References: <20200707145752.417212219@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20200707145754.171869800@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20200707153122.GA171624@pick.fieldses.org>
 <20200707172051.GT2722994@sasha-vm>
 <20200707172930.GU2722994@sasha-vm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200707172930.GU2722994@sasha-vm>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 01:29:30PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 01:20:51PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 11:31:22AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > NACK.
> > > 
> > > (How did this one even end up headed for stable?  It wasn't cc'd to
> > 
> > It came in when I was looking at the later nfs patches in this series
> > and figured it is a fix on its own.
> > 
> > > stable, it's not a bugfix, and it's not a small patch.)
> > 
> > If its not a bugfix, why did it go in -rc4 rather than waiting for the
> > merge window?

They went in during the merge window, unless I'm very confused.

> Sorry, my bad, I failed at shuffling patches around. I'll drop these.

OK, thanks.

--b.