Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 7 Jul 2020 20:50:49 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To:     Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <snawrocki@kernel.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
        Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: pwm: samsung: Do not require
 interrupts on Exynos SoCs
Message-ID: <20200707185049.GA4698@kozik-lap>
References: <20200702155149.12854-1-krzk@kernel.org>
 <20200706094157.kyag7p5df3vo54wx@pengutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
In-Reply-To: <20200706094157.kyag7p5df3vo54wx@pengutronix.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 11:41:57AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 05:51:42PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > The bindings required interrupts for all SoCs but actually only the PWM
> > timer clocksource (for S3C/S5P SoCs) was using them.  This PWM timer
> > clocksource driver is not used on Exynos SoCs thus the interrupts can be
> > marked as optional.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> 
> LGTM,
> 
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> 
> I'd expect it is ok to let this patch go in via whatever way the other
> patches go. (But it's Thierry who has the authority here.)

This patch is independent so it can go either through PWM tree or DT
bindings.  Usually the latter, so Rob was picking it up.

Thanks for ack.

Best regards,
Krzysztof