Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp7660ybt; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 14:29:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzuL2lpyEeYr2mqIc7nSy51UOFvMGxndqNAAQ+dJsJuohwXgOIai9a95B/vswhFjmBrqi0R X-Received: by 2002:a50:f187:: with SMTP id x7mr60571256edl.59.1594157371963; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 14:29:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594157371; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yR62aZHerlRFKQypj0VwXGf+3YOZd3KdZpNVqSFljnHHGE5nN0gaE1JhWgTjlLh3wp tgf00cauX1esQpknzQO80VJ3HAYgGpVizVMFFozHbhGPz7ZbaxZe5Nvl/c4dvBnzOFa9 aYUJDFeeM9OtDRO8V6neTceyabZOCQuc4P9+Iy+Xho5a/BD1v6QJ2lg4M6JShms9oMqo 2Tha8p4Nxg5l223HqBzAXuuQaLHpIc3NW5w8foJeZryzSzinH2DQpni+JUf7N/NhGB5b CTDE+9O9k0CENZJXZMqTatjyd0xXgh+uXFZpRn2UycpzQjmqm/A7ByBhZfKuYd64nzT1 RF7A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:date:from :dkim-signature; bh=0huEUzYXA/GGYX5cduiY4exKC/PaSEcRPcqWa+ZwYFA=; b=Z+pSXkzJJ8lU8uud8aO7PhJvItoTltI26UAzMIw4X0uUjmxPGDhrhPw30AZBxjaN0d i0dOE9SnsxUXUjijXDgT2XIEM/u60FfrQvpAg3DvmIVxfSDOksaDmxzflaDYG3R2uBf+ 5qKpEVx0E8/0tTTeqEDCr64ZqvfPgxD9rJLlWx4prIxYVOV2CLj8hJxb7KWr8C4jhml3 2OCDAdLbgnnZj/zB3MOXgApaOyyyQKnBvOVZFxO+O0Np0cI/mxQiB3RaPA/WhvpAf8JL 8kzya8GGE7A/+xDxZbCN6psawddKIdPuOnw2rJTU0ORyuxhl3W2LTC+a2qJc4+vtgsCB ouzQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=REr80juD; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gz3si15632354ejb.142.2020.07.07.14.29.08; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 14:29:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=REr80juD; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728492AbgGGV0o (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 17:26:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32806 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728184AbgGGV0o (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 17:26:44 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x842.google.com (mail-qt1-x842.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::842]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FA82C061755 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 14:26:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x842.google.com with SMTP id w27so9917284qtb.7 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 14:26:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=0huEUzYXA/GGYX5cduiY4exKC/PaSEcRPcqWa+ZwYFA=; b=REr80juDXRALebLkMrnwFOFOGJ4dV88o4rqAdC2cmyAwlETmOxJIjyBd8GLtZ+jRE8 lMVzMkOOlJSLf+vE0eZZJzH7aMrse+BOKTz6R/U3hXQkZ+eVRMg/B0KAF1yk35Ibas37 aiLYM3OIw9MKD9xhBAcspmb23w/Az1DFqUXnUwK1d4CtGditLu2xitN+DA1fPTkyur0B eb0mkvs5JBgS980el5Dec3jJZe5/puri/tjr6VWLZyyjk8yQc9fwTz5HpOR//LSLHpzO Fc/D5pGSXk2f4EuGmfmOLQG/mfh17vsN7Ck3jPymI2Vq3neKgmv5E+nZBcU8zR5SQeK/ EhSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=0huEUzYXA/GGYX5cduiY4exKC/PaSEcRPcqWa+ZwYFA=; b=gd6Jc0LwrLqCnSJBGVkdoEauHQIEYrrZlon4EHjhWUbIAcWMZ9xGCtx0VayZvdcpeH nUNkNjPNFnFZp8DfDD7vjWNhLM4m9PZSp8j4NMGzYNS4GUp9p6YH0ifw/F9njRrwp+6M Hmbkvdw6g2sLwfmDRjvDtcLzdXap+0Wy+AW32eRkiTE8hVRAzi2A+dmvpMmRwNeOiDYv 7tyWA/VBk93zkLZ1QVvAr3tDWOdExp/dQJmEnMVgmraoj4Ci4/0vlxeJEzleT61mQXu/ r1/CscXwduCIcdfgV1WafmgPoKLF4jq6/H4uKlxvTkuAR2K3Mqqq7LkbA+gpED02dOP8 XkJA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533iS+aKhmKZBbUdog5wk6vEKcAU4sGaY+JlxQ3LwTtpv+kth68z NFAVB1PPT/9w5HEUuvfq2lHxAPqIFSs= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:134a:: with SMTP id f10mr58330231qtj.131.1594157203241; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 14:26:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rani.riverdale.lan ([2001:470:1f07:5f3::b55f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f4sm26775479qtv.59.2020.07.07.14.26.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 07 Jul 2020 14:26:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Arvind Sankar X-Google-Original-From: Arvind Sankar Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 17:26:41 -0400 To: Tibor Raschko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mark Brown , tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] [PATCH] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology Message-ID: <20200707212641.GA1575320@rani.riverdale.lan> References: <20200706191555.GD6176@sirena.org.uk> <44713cf0-db41-bdd0-a41e-d710c346be12@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44713cf0-db41-bdd0-a41e-d710c346be12@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 02:48:25AM +0200, Tibor Raschko wrote: > > More generally etymological arguments are just not super relevant here > > anyway, the issues people have are around current perceptions rather > > than where things came from. > > This is where ignoring etymology in this case falls apart, claiming that the > current meaning is more important than the historical one. Yes it should be more > important, but it suggests that the current meaning is negative, which it is > not. In computer science (context!) these words do not have any negative > perception or connotation, and people in this field know this. Yes, outsiders > might not know this and could misunderstand them. But since when do experts in > computer science (or in any field of science for the matter) care if a layman > can correctly understand the field's technical terms? We never did and never > will, except in this particular case for some odd reason. > > Be honest: "blacklist" is a technical term where the actual meaning has no > negative connotation despite what people outside the field might think. But > apparently we don't care about the actual meaning. We also don't care about the > historical meaning or etymology. We only care about... well if not about the > meaning in the past or present, then I don't know what. Looking good in the media? Blacklist most definitely has a negative connotation in technical use. You blacklist devices that don't work properly, you blacklist drivers that don't work for your hardware, you blacklist domains that are sending spam or trying to mount network attacks on your servers. Things on the blacklist are "bad" in one way or the other, that's the reason they're on it.