Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932171AbWEARef (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 13:34:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932172AbWEARef (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 13:34:35 -0400 Received: from mx.pathscale.com ([64.160.42.68]:60560 "EHLO mx.pathscale.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932171AbWEARef (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 13:34:35 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 8 of 13] ipath - fix a number of RC protocol bugs From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" To: Roland Dreier Cc: Andrew Morton , openib-general@openib.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <20060425005654.4c08481f.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 10:34:34 -0700 Message-Id: <1146504874.2906.7.camel@chalcedony.pathscale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 (2.6.1-1.fc5.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 858 Lines: 24 On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 10:22 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > Andrew> Please don't play around with list_head internals like > Andrew> this - some speedfreak might legitimately choose to remove > Andrew> the list_head poisoning debug code, or make it > Andrew> Kconfigurable. > > Bryan, can you fix this up and resend this patch? Yep. We already have a fix; I just need to put it in my queue. > Are the other patches independent of this? Should I apply all the > others, or do I need to wait for the fixed version of this one? They're all independent of this, so please fire away. Thanks,