Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp209158ybt; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 20:46:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxeXYklhCNwmPInSgaUeCd8s/De0VZgjcUoQjqrikk6pjbg3VOJUnKlrJocazEfjN7NyjCk X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:363:: with SMTP id s3mr52429593edw.238.1594179984416; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 20:46:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594179984; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rrqPjT5lWWayf9x3bGL0fa1I/jVY7Bww2coJqmTORAJIcwkHNF0+coGGho4mw+mH78 aYcq82hSR3+b7mPwEVRaAeI8pPvjDSplswtKn4nHOdv+Z1GAy/3ADl8e9WwXbmwIms8F 7IdonD1tKLvv7VXv8JOwncvzB4x5W59Eoqj2wCOlCIP8Ht6OVpuNaSBj/va1pmPFmS1X 5BhHCnFfnRQEQXanutT/B12y4gmjlX6txnUBjgjMtpr+g9V8T1Ep8a+EFzf/wy4fdbg3 6mJ9d+XqKQ43hjE50cuo8DmFz95jQR6ChIX/7GNzL7McNr0HFjfwUqdMRRoL10W+4bLO 36ng== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=mHwnZGqBxO1eR5fw/gOLrflI6sKMZmZB5dQJW/fz1OI=; b=Y1hh8BhtcUor30TjfuUMcgVv5Kqx1kieuioG1oQEHEYV2HYosGBeRFD8NO3jiJ1oXF F56NCiCOYleZXluTncwg7+dFrjy55qNHko6pAKJyAbPG2fesSIm9jXtowit02gsnbe9h HajCfvIX6Phw6ODAfnV4KQZBfqESY0lkc/wt/I6DsFh2wxXWktV3xD3JVdOgyfENS/pQ BsgJjhT9RiaDn1XCkV6vDxvdPBQYL0SuF6oxTA8luiDFv4+SyVA0XhCiJcTAvimSz2Kn LiYJgjhtMbWpn8gTvy8F+1Cz7h1c+P+t1wc45ujiYhU9wiCxIvQKKn4xzxnsqpMBMtKO TeXA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=Fe+Nkt75; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j7si16251473ejm.155.2020.07.07.20.46.00; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 20:46:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=Fe+Nkt75; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729563AbgGHDnn (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 23:43:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34328 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728369AbgGHDnn (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 23:43:43 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x344.google.com (mail-ot1-x344.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::344]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18967C08C5DC for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 20:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x344.google.com with SMTP id a21so12658549otq.8 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 20:43:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mHwnZGqBxO1eR5fw/gOLrflI6sKMZmZB5dQJW/fz1OI=; b=Fe+Nkt75c5SHX6EoJc25ohkfwpVvt9Shez4gGJsFcnlofCj1p4EV0/9LYeXnB7Ps5I GbuUp7Z9dTQ77ECCS2E3WkR/9ObL4djO5nw+5lALHOqtF+X3XwCoWSAyNqBy41djgYc+ E36Ge2uQyBowWhOaERpqgUrExPkfmEUp60YAiYcfYIoCEJ4GxhSXJM4C44UUVdAKgptU BzkgjU5yxVVL/jD+u5cU4WT57KieNFDZ/83O+CbyRoYpVJ5FSBPy6+vLcAmH+5aLHsrU 2d644BAm8cYMwpkzlShwpkcSY0FWHEBC8SU+QSuKgaTjXfzcJJnkF3rYniKnfCr8PmW8 LRjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mHwnZGqBxO1eR5fw/gOLrflI6sKMZmZB5dQJW/fz1OI=; b=iF/6x7Yx2/ljHvtq93+wKhNGiLJSxWMbcmyWAw0rOmTZo2XrIEZyZqt4FZaODP8rth CWeY7kStGsidUdOQ1dlFHfNThoo7D/zc7Y4kZ4gGmx9NdP2yZuGjH6d+Q/yQSa0FXV+8 OOp9+o+/vLFyKKz830Mi5hEXyAzrj9X9uWNosO/f4WuvTeTRjarCVtkKb+i+PnnO2bFq xoZXCQevP0sHfjUfasMiv96dgsoB7036yo2HG5V4s5N/kUknB0PRViOSZGAmCXM+oipX PRJBU38v1VDWhvudeE8MFPuea2mbOvfMFHd/deFr2TOwZvJp9RgcZxBWeZ+aFI/tO56d k6Fw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532LvKgqlbF7WS0mXhWwTOt9CH5l2Tsq8VD482q+JjvgdWi/1Unb f0ROB1/zt+is5UhhOMv6B6Hah/X36WX4+7MSnXCIcg== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7303:: with SMTP id e3mr40868563otk.221.1594179821275; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 20:43:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200414134629.54567-1-orjan.eide@arm.com> <20200414141849.55654-1-orjan.eide@arm.com> <20200414142810.GA958163@kroah.com> <20200416102508.GA820251@kroah.com> <20200420082207.ui7iyg7dsnred2vv@wittgenstein> <20200421080544.GA611314@kroah.com> <20200703070403.GB2221524@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20200703070403.GB2221524@kroah.com> From: John Stultz Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 20:43:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: Skip sync if not mapped To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: driverdevel , =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=98rjan_Eide?= , Todd Kjos , Lecopzer Chen , Arnd Bergmann , Daniel Vetter , lkml , dri-devel , Sumit Semwal , "moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" , =?UTF-8?B?QXJ2ZSBIasO4bm5ldsOlZw==?= , Laura Abbott , Anders Pedersen , Joel Fernandes , "Darren Hart (VMware)" , Christian Brauner , nd , Martijn Coenen , Laura Abbott , Christian Brauner , linux-media@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:03 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:05:44AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 01:03:39PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > > The dmabuf heaps have been in an official kernel now for all of three > > > weeks. So yea, we can "delete [ION] and see who even notices", but I > > > worry that may seem a bit like contempt for the folks doing the work > > > on transitioning over, which doesn't help getting them to participate > > > within the community. > > > > But they aren't participating in the community today as no one is > > touching the ion code. So I fail to see how keeping a dead-end-version > > of ion in the kernel tree really affects anyone these days. > > So, any thoughts here? What's the timeline for ion being able to be > removed that you are comfortable with? Sorry for the slow reply. So my earlier plan was to drop it after the next LTS? thanks -john