Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp317686ybt; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 00:18:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxqD6TB8V+w8XP7FRiddOnVZnWVftdbkItxp1m3z+841TH/ctNh1g4Qtes4UqWT8dq//+0V X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6d0e:: with SMTP id m14mr49839124ejr.251.1594192737938; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:18:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594192737; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=h4htxnjp/AkPiNO6lZ2dk2rpdWO1SfidKbxH2QI8KmobFcumIHsS8gYKsg9vlw6Uul EO7QFtlI9fNMpy61S2vTxQmcJA21Ovr00r0aOqPUPnkr2K7UqlKD27G0NMnnuVTjTJqM WbfhmSqyuWrAQWsg9mvljbwMMrY1GogKVYtIk16KArhpGY7ilEmPWWvVKhK80hBhxF3M HfIckfLzvQm5Funq2j+2gNuoVheCwERvpqDkLysO4NICylotHWTxpso9hwRXxsqWM/X7 7pMm7k5T73V0jPfqqwjQJUgBpBcFe1W6oJh1LwsJonEVMAQwp4KHxf5oRHSlj7RLgJPq oPug== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:autocrypt:from:references:cc:to:subject :dkim-signature; bh=dx3HZ+yedwYcaidK+QZbCcB6z1aYUQHDgwu6LUEYe/4=; b=OVM57n2DKamdY2/1KlmyhSN3qfg2GIEnhgz4dY4S1+PeBL1PLWB0l3DgSMdz4cxgcJ D3gJ8p2tl17JVJBn5yMPEKxPodZFEErdMeQl2ML+nM4cPA/L4cmGFYqU5sSh6efiI6mX ns7Yt53QWK2JnYGDuNrd/kmGMoUevay2wXADsG3lfuH3iIW0AMuODYnE9S+s/x08ZECn wlTULwJefAkhTlpf55f8Qj8l3/+k9RHhJs129HHKsZHPmZ7GjTjVKb3vKvd7RBds2q5i af7L7WXBdrKs+TKqeurvWf1OHgxDYBKxliM9J9kdS+AwhmvdTfZ7zS08+PA8qR7c4xEk 7DeA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UbUNMvUe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f1si15421907ejx.211.2020.07.08.00.18.34; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 00:18:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=UbUNMvUe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730128AbgGHHQP (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 8 Jul 2020 03:16:15 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:56922 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729881AbgGHHQO (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2020 03:16:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1594192572; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=dx3HZ+yedwYcaidK+QZbCcB6z1aYUQHDgwu6LUEYe/4=; b=UbUNMvUeC/lodaXM+IRgCoHShNxvHrSF53gIVKvQIoDrYDeVbubOTKdW8NJ1UKfE3zkeNd VADa4L6BqTDTb31wrvHGcjzl6uA5wHPRKM9dkuODt9q/1cq6LWLmJVK29s4pebwSEvuCpp EL9VK5UeeqOfy7XUriogwCcgnQEOLCk= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-273-g9Z8KC3yNxm1InmXP6I2-g-1; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 03:16:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: g9Z8KC3yNxm1InmXP6I2-g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 078DD107ACCA; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 07:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.113.117] (ovpn-113-117.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.117]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E375A10013D7; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 07:16:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64/numa: export memory_add_physaddr_to_nid as EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL To: Dan Williams Cc: Mike Rapoport , Justin He , Michal Hocko , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Vishal Verma , Dave Jiang , Andrew Morton , Baoquan He , Chuhong Yuan , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , Kaly Xin References: <20200707055917.143653-1-justin.he@arm.com> <20200707055917.143653-2-justin.he@arm.com> <20200707115454.GN5913@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200708062217.GE386073@linux.ibm.com> From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABtCREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT6JAlgEEwEIAEICGwMFCQlmAYAGCwkIBwMCBhUI AgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl3pImkCGQEACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1o+VA//SFvIHUAvul05u6wKv/pIR6aICPdpF9EIgEU448g+7FfDgQwcEny1pbEzAmiw zAXIQ9H0NZh96lcq+yDLtONnXk/bEYWHHUA014A1wqcYNRY8RvY1+eVHb0uu0KYQoXkzvu+s Dncuguk470XPnscL27hs8PgOP6QjG4jt75K2LfZ0eAqTOUCZTJxA8A7E9+XTYuU0hs7QVrWJ jQdFxQbRMrYz7uP8KmTK9/Cnvqehgl4EzyRaZppshruKMeyheBgvgJd5On1wWq4ZUV5PFM4x II3QbD3EJfWbaJMR55jI9dMFa+vK7MFz3rhWOkEx/QR959lfdRSTXdxs8V3zDvChcmRVGN8U Vo93d1YNtWnA9w6oCW1dnDZ4kgQZZSBIjp6iHcA08apzh7DPi08jL7M9UQByeYGr8KuR4i6e RZI6xhlZerUScVzn35ONwOC91VdYiQgjemiVLq1WDDZ3B7DIzUZ4RQTOaIWdtXBWb8zWakt/ ztGhsx0e39Gvt3391O1PgcA7ilhvqrBPemJrlb9xSPPRbaNAW39P8ws/UJnzSJqnHMVxbRZC Am4add/SM+OCP0w3xYss1jy9T+XdZa0lhUvJfLy7tNcjVG/sxkBXOaSC24MFPuwnoC9WvCVQ ZBxouph3kqc4Dt5X1EeXVLeba+466P1fe1rC8MbcwDkoUo65Ag0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAGJAiUEGAECAA8FAlXLn5ECGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1qA6w/+M+ggFv+JdVsz5+ZIc6MSyGUozASX+bmIuPeIecc9UsFRatc91LuJCKMkD9Uv GOcWSeFpLrSGRQ1Z7EMzFVU//qVs6uzhsNk0RYMyS0B6oloW3FpyQ+zOVylFWQCzoyyf227y GW8HnXunJSC+4PtlL2AY4yZjAVAPLK2l6mhgClVXTQ/S7cBoTQKP+jvVJOoYkpnFxWE9pn4t H5QIFk7Ip8TKr5k3fXVWk4lnUi9MTF/5L/mWqdyIO1s7cjharQCstfWCzWrVeVctpVoDfJWp 4LwTuQ5yEM2KcPeElLg5fR7WB2zH97oI6/Ko2DlovmfQqXh9xWozQt0iGy5tWzh6I0JrlcxJ ileZWLccC4XKD1037Hy2FLAjzfoWgwBLA6ULu0exOOdIa58H4PsXtkFPrUF980EEibUp0zFz GotRVekFAceUaRvAj7dh76cToeZkfsjAvBVb4COXuhgX6N4pofgNkW2AtgYu1nUsPAo+NftU CxrhjHtLn4QEBpkbErnXQyMjHpIatlYGutVMS91XTQXYydCh5crMPs7hYVsvnmGHIaB9ZMfB njnuI31KBiLUks+paRkHQlFcgS2N3gkRBzH7xSZ+t7Re3jvXdXEzKBbQ+dC3lpJB0wPnyMcX FOTT3aZT7IgePkt5iC/BKBk3hqKteTnJFeVIT7EC+a6YUFg= Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: <6aae78fa-b505-0f76-087b-d8b2146c62f1@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 09:16:01 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08.07.20 09:04, Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 11:59 PM David Hildenbrand wrote: >> >> On 08.07.20 08:22, Mike Rapoport wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 09:27:43PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 9:08 PM Justin He wrote: >>>> [..] >>>>>> Especially for architectures that use memblock info for numa info >>>>>> (which seems to be everyone except x86) why not implement a generic >>>>>> memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() that does: >>>>>> >>>>>> int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 addr) >>>>>> { >>>>>> unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn, pfn = PHYS_PFN(addr); >>>>>> int nid; >>>>>> >>>>>> for_each_online_node(nid) { >>>>>> get_pfn_range_for_nid(nid, &start_pfn, &end_pfn); >>>>>> if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn <= end_pfn) >>>>>> return nid; >>>>>> } >>>>>> return NUMA_NO_NODE; >>>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your suggestion, >>>>> Could I wrap the codes and let memory_add_physaddr_to_nid simply invoke >>>>> phys_to_target_node()? >>>> >>>> I think it needs to be the reverse. phys_to_target_node() should call >>>> memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() by default, but fall back to searching >>>> reserved memory address ranges in memblock. See phys_to_target_node() >>>> in arch/x86/mm/numa.c. That one uses numa_meminfo instead of memblock, >>>> but the principle is the same i.e. that a target node may not be >>>> represented in memblock.memory, but memblock.reserved. I'm working on >>>> a patch to provide a function similar to get_pfn_range_for_nid() that >>>> operates on reserved memory. >>> >>> Do we really need yet another memblock iterator? >>> I think only x86 has memory that is not in memblock.memory but only in >>> memblock.reserved. >> >> Reading about abusing the memblock allcoator once again in memory >> hotplug paths makes me shiver. > > Technical reasoning please? ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK is (AFAIK) only a hack for arm64 to implement pfn_valid(), because they zap out individual pages corresponding to memory holes of full sections. I am not a friend of adding more post-init code to rely on memblock data. It just makes it harder to eventually get rid of ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK. > > arm64 numa information is established from memblock data. It seems > counterproductive to ignore that fact if we're already touching > memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() and have a use case for a driver to call > it. ... and we are trying to handle the "only a single dummy node" case (patch #2), or what am I missing? What is there to optimize currently? -- Thanks, David / dhildenb