Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 8 Jul 2020 09:44:18 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: add an API to check if a streamming mapping needs sync calls
Message-ID: <20200708074418.GA6815@lst.de>
References: <20200629130359.2690853-1-hch@lst.de> <b97104e1-433c-8e35-59c6-b4dad047464c@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <b97104e1-433c-8e35-59c6-b4dad047464c@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 03:39:01PM +0200, Bj?rn T?pel wrote:
> On 2020-06-29 15:03, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> this series lifts the somewhat hacky checks in the XSK code if a DMA
>> streaming mapping needs dma_sync_single_for_{device,cpu} calls to the
>> DMA API.
>>
>
> Thanks a lot for working on, and fixing this, Christoph!
>
> I took the series for a spin, and there are (obviously) no performance
> regressions.
>
> Would the patches go through the net/bpf trees or somewhere else?

Where did this end up?  I still don't see it in Linus' tree and this
is getting urgent now.