Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp366666ybt; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 01:46:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwrNe+x89EVJXHmOIaMIM5BURJzhYdVUpdFaSTJJ/NqFQ0MlXvuWVVsE2HOIgnxafsX/NAW X-Received: by 2002:a50:f01d:: with SMTP id r29mr66084812edl.158.1594198015094; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 01:46:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594198015; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SlYoglPbTFz5VX16bWRgG58LSGa3vmv6TI43HVhdSWBvn2mvzqawsXVs8Ipg34857u 0r69lzeSfux67rFHpRzS//PRxOToySPHkleVX4hOUKnyqijWGMxkRiVPSf1l8a67o2HE OJLkMSDETmzv1U6nPAi2J9frs1ME2U/qrb3T8kcbaIaQdwJ/ITJwS3qWtQNRYEWjsGa6 fP+h+IoKfHd/9hrMNT9YHxj0xrHxbfMGg2JhVOGBPe+bbgZdxPJtLK8huRvO5vbu79TW 4dvQMhSYSl8D3WDCgfPO5bkRvWiU6iUd7tW2cgzyAjgb9utbIEUi0YwKnTcQHw7gv3pb 1ASQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:autocrypt:from:references:cc:to:subject :dkim-signature; bh=GXnAzIuEhM6ySvZeWtAspp6WNakNgEcFzykCdfB7qis=; b=Kq/NHbk67CVInH7LAyIORVa8FOYI05HMRnje/TFgTFLaITVdxV8XQhMMENjeuM7vAU SzdLFCnDpQJfywm6/TcbUIDIcMcTzj5K72aDtNsjXxBP6bb3cu/ysjPLkJM3IzCKWOcm hLHk6GZGkyVStqT3k9lyRZXtOUudHSsq1yNs2RO+i6zeUAp83CrGOKwal9twa0Q9C2Mb gpQjjMCWPR47NBcmRDmbwOEOH8ky+cdElquvBWf1tOikA0i4z+g/xD3tbBQBjJRX1wxf 0r4hFeoBgZRge6mALQVeSId/+/7DSyln2/VrQHUp2Rp9LQIaeIwonf8GD2B3X/wjzFSO oY6w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=PaxGZpK4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h14si16295907edl.132.2020.07.08.01.46.31; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 01:46:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=PaxGZpK4; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728289AbgGHIp2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 8 Jul 2020 04:45:28 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:44590 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726144AbgGHIp1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2020 04:45:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1594197925; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=GXnAzIuEhM6ySvZeWtAspp6WNakNgEcFzykCdfB7qis=; b=PaxGZpK4+oyuY58kcfPZhG70TOQn1cHc+HC7U92YfXkQRGxmit4qbxqAwVUN4BTmLjH+h+ 4MvdOgGl522Kq5xLtPNryjgMgfuHl3HOFHDDNFInghP8yEzD8r94EjkcvNTri6MYrJoqRH ESDcM9eDFgrOc0PNnDAw2k+D4d2n2F0= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-370-hu-x-ztUMPit87WUGx7QbQ-1; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 04:45:23 -0400 X-MC-Unique: hu-x-ztUMPit87WUGx7QbQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78510800D5C; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 08:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.113.117] (ovpn-113-117.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.117]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F075C1D6; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 08:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64/numa: export memory_add_physaddr_to_nid as EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Dan Williams , Michal Hocko , Jia He , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Vishal Verma , Dave Jiang , Andrew Morton , Baoquan He , Chuhong Yuan , Linux ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux MM , linux-nvdimm , Kaly Xin References: <20200707055917.143653-2-justin.he@arm.com> <20200707115454.GN5913@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200707121302.GB9411@linux.ibm.com> <474f93e7-c709-1a13-5418-29f1777f614c@redhat.com> <20200707180043.GA386073@linux.ibm.com> <20200708052626.GB386073@linux.ibm.com> <9a009cf6-6c30-91ca-a1a5-9aa090c66631@redhat.com> <999ea296-4695-1219-6a4d-a027718f61e5@redhat.com> <20200708083951.GH386073@linux.ibm.com> From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABtCREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT6JAlgEEwEIAEICGwMFCQlmAYAGCwkIBwMCBhUI AgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl3pImkCGQEACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1o+VA//SFvIHUAvul05u6wKv/pIR6aICPdpF9EIgEU448g+7FfDgQwcEny1pbEzAmiw zAXIQ9H0NZh96lcq+yDLtONnXk/bEYWHHUA014A1wqcYNRY8RvY1+eVHb0uu0KYQoXkzvu+s Dncuguk470XPnscL27hs8PgOP6QjG4jt75K2LfZ0eAqTOUCZTJxA8A7E9+XTYuU0hs7QVrWJ jQdFxQbRMrYz7uP8KmTK9/Cnvqehgl4EzyRaZppshruKMeyheBgvgJd5On1wWq4ZUV5PFM4x II3QbD3EJfWbaJMR55jI9dMFa+vK7MFz3rhWOkEx/QR959lfdRSTXdxs8V3zDvChcmRVGN8U Vo93d1YNtWnA9w6oCW1dnDZ4kgQZZSBIjp6iHcA08apzh7DPi08jL7M9UQByeYGr8KuR4i6e RZI6xhlZerUScVzn35ONwOC91VdYiQgjemiVLq1WDDZ3B7DIzUZ4RQTOaIWdtXBWb8zWakt/ ztGhsx0e39Gvt3391O1PgcA7ilhvqrBPemJrlb9xSPPRbaNAW39P8ws/UJnzSJqnHMVxbRZC Am4add/SM+OCP0w3xYss1jy9T+XdZa0lhUvJfLy7tNcjVG/sxkBXOaSC24MFPuwnoC9WvCVQ ZBxouph3kqc4Dt5X1EeXVLeba+466P1fe1rC8MbcwDkoUo65Ag0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAGJAiUEGAECAA8FAlXLn5ECGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1qA6w/+M+ggFv+JdVsz5+ZIc6MSyGUozASX+bmIuPeIecc9UsFRatc91LuJCKMkD9Uv GOcWSeFpLrSGRQ1Z7EMzFVU//qVs6uzhsNk0RYMyS0B6oloW3FpyQ+zOVylFWQCzoyyf227y GW8HnXunJSC+4PtlL2AY4yZjAVAPLK2l6mhgClVXTQ/S7cBoTQKP+jvVJOoYkpnFxWE9pn4t H5QIFk7Ip8TKr5k3fXVWk4lnUi9MTF/5L/mWqdyIO1s7cjharQCstfWCzWrVeVctpVoDfJWp 4LwTuQ5yEM2KcPeElLg5fR7WB2zH97oI6/Ko2DlovmfQqXh9xWozQt0iGy5tWzh6I0JrlcxJ ileZWLccC4XKD1037Hy2FLAjzfoWgwBLA6ULu0exOOdIa58H4PsXtkFPrUF980EEibUp0zFz GotRVekFAceUaRvAj7dh76cToeZkfsjAvBVb4COXuhgX6N4pofgNkW2AtgYu1nUsPAo+NftU CxrhjHtLn4QEBpkbErnXQyMjHpIatlYGutVMS91XTQXYydCh5crMPs7hYVsvnmGHIaB9ZMfB njnuI31KBiLUks+paRkHQlFcgS2N3gkRBzH7xSZ+t7Re3jvXdXEzKBbQ+dC3lpJB0wPnyMcX FOTT3aZT7IgePkt5iC/BKBk3hqKteTnJFeVIT7EC+a6YUFg= Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 10:45:17 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200708083951.GH386073@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08.07.20 10:39, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 10:26:41AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 08.07.20 09:50, Dan Williams wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 12:22 AM David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue 07-07-20 13:59:15, Jia He wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> This exports memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() for module driver to use. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() is a fallback option to get the nid in case >>>>>>>>>>> NUMA_NO_NID is detected. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand >>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jia He >>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>> arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 5 +++-- >>>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c >>>>>>>>>>> index aafcee3e3f7e..7eeb31740248 100644 >>>>>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c >>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c >>>>>>>>>>> @@ -464,10 +464,11 @@ void __init arm64_numa_init(void) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> /* >>>>>>>>>>> * We hope that we will be hotplugging memory on nodes we already know about, >>>>>>>>>>> - * such that acpi_get_node() succeeds and we never fall back to this... >>>>>>>>>>> + * such that acpi_get_node() succeeds. But when SRAT is not present, the node >>>>>>>>>>> + * id may be probed as NUMA_NO_NODE by acpi, Here provide a fallback option. >>>>>>>>>>> */ >>>>>>>>>>> int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 addr) >>>>>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>>>>> - pr_warn("Unknown node for memory at 0x%llx, assuming node 0\n", addr); >>>>>>>>>>> return 0; >>>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memory_add_physaddr_to_nid); >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Does it make sense to export a noop function? Wouldn't make more sense >>>>>>>>>> to simply make it static inline somewhere in a header? I haven't checked >>>>>>>>>> whether there is an easy way to do that sanely bu this just hit my eyes. > >> I'd be curious if what we are trying to optimize here is actually worth >> optimizing. IOW, is there a well-known scenario where the dummy value on >> arm64 would be problematic and is worth the effort? > > Well, it started with Michal's comment above that EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() > for a stub might be an overkill. > > I think Jia's suggestion [1] with addition of a comment that explains > why and when the stub will be used, can work for both > memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() and phys_to_target_node(). Agreed. > > But on more theoretical/fundmanetal level, I think we lack a generic > abstraction similar to e.g. x86 'struct numa_meminfo' that serves as > translaton of firmware supplied information into data that can be used > by the generic mm without need to reimplement it for each and every > arch. Right. As I expressed, I am not a friend of using memblock for that, and the pgdat node span is tricky. Maybe abstracting that x86 concept is possible in some way (and we could restrict the information to boot-time properties, so we don't have to mess with memory hot(un)plug - just as done for numa_meminfo AFAIKS). -- Thanks, David / dhildenb