Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 8 Jul 2020 12:59:04 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To:     Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sparse improvements & regressions for Linux v5.7-rc1 -> v5.8-rc1
Message-ID: <20200708095904.GI2549@kadam>
References: <20200708000651.f5bykhd3mhgsbvk7@ltop.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200708000651.f5bykhd3mhgsbvk7@ltop.local>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 02:06:51AM +0200, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> I've finally written a silly script to easily compare my tests
> of Sparse on the kernel. So, it's now easy to share those results.
> 
> It's a comparison of Sparse's unique warnings between v5.7-rc1 &
> v5.8-rc1 on x86-64 (defconfig + allyesconfig). The results are
> quite similar on other architectures.
> 
> Note that the differences can be caused by changes in the kernel
> code or in Sparse code.
> 
> Have fun.
> 

This is quite fun!  Could you post the raw errors from the v5.8-rc1
kernel as well?  Probably it's too big for LKML, so it would have to
be posted to pastebin or something.

regards,
dan carpenter