Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932258AbWEAVBy (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 17:01:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932259AbWEAVBy (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 17:01:54 -0400 Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:19174 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932258AbWEAVBx (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 17:01:53 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 23:01:45 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Jiri Slaby cc: David Woodhouse , "Randy.Dunlap" , lkml , akpm Subject: Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: add typedefs chapter In-Reply-To: <4456732B.2090009@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20060430174426.a21b4614.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <1146502730.2885.128.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <4456732B.2090009@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 658 Lines: 22 >>>> What about task_t vs struct task_struct? Both are used in the kernel. >>> task_t should probably die. >> >> Acked. >Wouldn't this be a janitors' task? Too simple :) find rc3 -type f -print0 | xargs -0 perl -i -pe 's/\btask_t\b/struct task_struct' + a compile test afterwards. Something I missed? (Besides that lines may get longer and violate the 80-column CodingStyle rule.) Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/