Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932289AbWEAV4w (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 17:56:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932290AbWEAV4w (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 17:56:52 -0400 Received: from ntwklan-62-233-162-146.devs.futuro.pl ([62.233.162.146]:42449 "EHLO mail.softwaremind.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932289AbWEAV4v (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 17:56:51 -0400 From: Marcin Hlybin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Open Discussion, kernel in production environment Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 23:57:48 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605012357.48623.marcin.hlybin@swmind.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 911 Lines: 23 Hello, I always configure and compile a kernel throwing out all unusable options and I never use modules in production environment (especially for the router). But my superior has got the other opinion - he claims that distribution kernel is quite good and in these days optimization has no sense because of powerful hadrware. What do you think? I have few arguments for this discussion but I wonder what you say. Please, try to substantiate your opinions. And the second question: which kernel branch/version *and why* do you use in production environment? Regards -- Marcin Hlybin, marcin.hlybin@swmind.com Sys/Net Administrator, tel. +48 12 2523 402 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/