Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932297AbWEAWI4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 18:08:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932298AbWEAWI4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 18:08:56 -0400 Received: from linux.dunaweb.hu ([62.77.196.1]:53959 "EHLO linux.dunaweb.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932297AbWEAWIz (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2006 18:08:55 -0400 Message-ID: <445686F0.3080402@dunaweb.hu> Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 00:08:48 +0200 From: Zoltan Boszormenyi User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060313) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nathan Scott Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Piggin Subject: Re: Bad page state in process 'nfsd' with xfs References: <4454D59C.7000501@dunaweb.hu> <20060501102440.A1864834@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> <4455C1D0.5060104@dunaweb.hu> <20060502073325.B1873249@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20060502073325.B1873249@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1541 Lines: 55 Hi, Nathan Scott ?rta: > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:07:44AM +0200, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Nathan Scott ?rta: >> >>> On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 05:19:56PM +0200, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote: >>> >>> >>>> ... >>>> Or not. I had an FC3/x86-64 system until two days ago, now I have FC5/86-64. >>>> >>>> When FC3 was installed I chose to format the partitions to XFS and since >>>> then >>>> I had Oopses regularly with or without VMWare modules. >>>> >>>> >>> What was the stack trace for your oops...? >>> >>> cheers. >>> >>> >> I reported some Oopses for earlier kernels, they are here: >> > > These aren't oopses. They do look similar, but slightly > different to the other report - your page count there is > off with the pixies, but its not as clear that its a single > bit error - yours are more like 0xfffe0000. Quite strange. > You also have the odd high-32-bits-mirrors-low-32-bits in > page flags, both with one bit set. > > Not sure XFS can be causing this (we don't touch page count > for regular file pages, and only touch PageUptodate in flags > IIRC, like most/all filesystems). > > Were you also using NFS, as in the other report? > > cheers. > > No, it's just a standalone machine. Best regards, Zolt?n B?sz?rm?nyi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/