Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp686069ybt; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 09:11:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+Cd2vengflxlk8ZMhRxHpWe5dRoyeK9ZiH9dURfBTnWvIZafr2Ibu8BXP4703p94ddpYA X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:364e:: with SMTP id r14mr40899210ejb.258.1594224697657; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 09:11:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594224697; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LRDbG+aQdo+1E+jIT2HPMEgSHR4/mh69Pkoh/Ih4uvM+ePDukfJtcaL8SA599BHF5B T2tN0hBfLjb3+29GdSTxrGyleNMELvSlWh9DwhgQNFIKPGLayvmql1uO7DFlfU2ap5YE AHLeEsJ0jDQUUwshQLuDeAreUij1oNAiBf+pLO5zJXDNOdBifdGcL/UaeFzSQ2Dx8NYU XFYywQf5GHzZZwY1ovIk7h8F33BJmbJ5vV2p1ZS3XfCpmC+bl/Fqqly2VrQ9ynuDk43k iyE+HsS8iZwLLtCahP5B55ZerIZNe2eWMMj4QOl4B3ff8Nt7XkMR8hTliOyqeU7KHPIR zfAA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:autocrypt:from:references:cc:to:subject :dkim-signature; bh=NHFtXPZIQXoSsc784elRjImGnK10j9RKkZcPgB6W5jw=; b=T+kfq0Daf1iwvlaVvpxdTjwKrwKM2T/i51xD9m1k+Rqk9Yr5QbAiwDTWWkfmSyb0kN WQioA7/4OyzraPikfhc1+VJLIjbHo/PXMmp+M0pwli+C+nKn4rIbJzdtGN/lqj/5p9db N9nw+pzazjLbgx1HGRh8JEtH2mTBk8LNXJ1fMBT1ComzrauC/hnXm2xiUe6h+vaAye+1 ogSV2IWGQmQ5pH9OkdhhP376kBrWqdRWP4gtIffVdLBr5WuTviwhaaIEDdeqgHv0LwEo qAqvDjbCR3LbNQfTxNX9PgovkgijoJNSTVhZbskRI1hEP6LtBvou3klP78zcS0g3iZRq DY5Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=MUlwru6o; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u17si223334ejj.13.2020.07.08.09.11.13; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 09:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=MUlwru6o; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730529AbgGHQKg (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 8 Jul 2020 12:10:36 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:29669 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730093AbgGHQKg (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2020 12:10:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1594224633; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=NHFtXPZIQXoSsc784elRjImGnK10j9RKkZcPgB6W5jw=; b=MUlwru6ogANX8PnW6EBogeyD9SoOAB1Od9MNcIUGmCtRS4DXJlcQUV33B/HAXhM8YpLoM1 T9peXXe/a007ZHyx1U0ABd1I1Vdy0KAqkU+t6CVJF+bBkEkGLETiPifrwCaRCfGgFnsxtV 8PRECRAWPDuIgx5q1iwnRnWBvvsNscw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-453-wliXH6sQNMGgSvnM9fu2KQ-1; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 12:10:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: wliXH6sQNMGgSvnM9fu2KQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07872107ACF7; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 16:10:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.113.117] (ovpn-113-117.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.117]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED16A1001925; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 16:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64/numa: export memory_add_physaddr_to_nid as EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL To: Dan Williams Cc: Mike Rapoport , Mike Rapoport , Michal Hocko , Jia He , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Vishal Verma , Dave Jiang , Andrew Morton , Baoquan He , Chuhong Yuan , Linux ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux MM , linux-nvdimm , Kaly Xin References: <20200707180043.GA386073@linux.ibm.com> <20200708052626.GB386073@linux.ibm.com> <9a009cf6-6c30-91ca-a1a5-9aa090c66631@redhat.com> <999ea296-4695-1219-6a4d-a027718f61e5@redhat.com> <20200708083951.GH386073@linux.ibm.com> <20200708091520.GE128651@kernel.org> <20200708094549.GA781326@linux.ibm.com> <98166184-3aaf-479e-bfb3-fc737f4ac98d@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABtCREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT6JAlgEEwEIAEICGwMFCQlmAYAGCwkIBwMCBhUI AgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl3pImkCGQEACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1o+VA//SFvIHUAvul05u6wKv/pIR6aICPdpF9EIgEU448g+7FfDgQwcEny1pbEzAmiw zAXIQ9H0NZh96lcq+yDLtONnXk/bEYWHHUA014A1wqcYNRY8RvY1+eVHb0uu0KYQoXkzvu+s Dncuguk470XPnscL27hs8PgOP6QjG4jt75K2LfZ0eAqTOUCZTJxA8A7E9+XTYuU0hs7QVrWJ jQdFxQbRMrYz7uP8KmTK9/Cnvqehgl4EzyRaZppshruKMeyheBgvgJd5On1wWq4ZUV5PFM4x II3QbD3EJfWbaJMR55jI9dMFa+vK7MFz3rhWOkEx/QR959lfdRSTXdxs8V3zDvChcmRVGN8U Vo93d1YNtWnA9w6oCW1dnDZ4kgQZZSBIjp6iHcA08apzh7DPi08jL7M9UQByeYGr8KuR4i6e RZI6xhlZerUScVzn35ONwOC91VdYiQgjemiVLq1WDDZ3B7DIzUZ4RQTOaIWdtXBWb8zWakt/ ztGhsx0e39Gvt3391O1PgcA7ilhvqrBPemJrlb9xSPPRbaNAW39P8ws/UJnzSJqnHMVxbRZC Am4add/SM+OCP0w3xYss1jy9T+XdZa0lhUvJfLy7tNcjVG/sxkBXOaSC24MFPuwnoC9WvCVQ ZBxouph3kqc4Dt5X1EeXVLeba+466P1fe1rC8MbcwDkoUo65Ag0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAGJAiUEGAECAA8FAlXLn5ECGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1qA6w/+M+ggFv+JdVsz5+ZIc6MSyGUozASX+bmIuPeIecc9UsFRatc91LuJCKMkD9Uv GOcWSeFpLrSGRQ1Z7EMzFVU//qVs6uzhsNk0RYMyS0B6oloW3FpyQ+zOVylFWQCzoyyf227y GW8HnXunJSC+4PtlL2AY4yZjAVAPLK2l6mhgClVXTQ/S7cBoTQKP+jvVJOoYkpnFxWE9pn4t H5QIFk7Ip8TKr5k3fXVWk4lnUi9MTF/5L/mWqdyIO1s7cjharQCstfWCzWrVeVctpVoDfJWp 4LwTuQ5yEM2KcPeElLg5fR7WB2zH97oI6/Ko2DlovmfQqXh9xWozQt0iGy5tWzh6I0JrlcxJ ileZWLccC4XKD1037Hy2FLAjzfoWgwBLA6ULu0exOOdIa58H4PsXtkFPrUF980EEibUp0zFz GotRVekFAceUaRvAj7dh76cToeZkfsjAvBVb4COXuhgX6N4pofgNkW2AtgYu1nUsPAo+NftU CxrhjHtLn4QEBpkbErnXQyMjHpIatlYGutVMS91XTQXYydCh5crMPs7hYVsvnmGHIaB9ZMfB njnuI31KBiLUks+paRkHQlFcgS2N3gkRBzH7xSZ+t7Re3jvXdXEzKBbQ+dC3lpJB0wPnyMcX FOTT3aZT7IgePkt5iC/BKBk3hqKteTnJFeVIT7EC+a6YUFg= Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 18:10:19 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08.07.20 17:50, Dan Williams wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 3:04 AM David Hildenbrand wrote: >> >> On 08.07.20 11:45, Mike Rapoport wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 11:25:36AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> On 08.07.20 11:15, Mike Rapoport wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> But on more theoretical/fundmanetal level, I think we lack a generic >>>>>>> abstraction similar to e.g. x86 'struct numa_meminfo' that serves as >>>>>>> translaton of firmware supplied information into data that can be used >>>>>>> by the generic mm without need to reimplement it for each and every >>>>>>> arch. >>>>>> >>>>>> Right. As I expressed, I am not a friend of using memblock for that, and >>>>>> the pgdat node span is tricky. >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe abstracting that x86 concept is possible in some way (and we could >>>>>> restrict the information to boot-time properties, so we don't have to >>>>>> mess with memory hot(un)plug - just as done for numa_meminfo AFAIKS). >>>>> >>>>> I agree with pgdat part and disagree about memblock. It already has >>>>> non-init physmap, why won't we add memblock.memory to the mix? ;-) >>>> >>>> Can we generalize and tweak physmap to contain node info? That's all we >>>> need, no? (the special mem= parameter handling should not matter for our >>>> use case, where "physmap" and "memory" would differ) >>> >>> TBH, I have only random vague thoughts at the moment. This might be an >>> option. But then we need to enable physmap on !s390, right? >> >> Yes, looks like it. >> >>> >>>>> Now, seriously, memblock already has all the necessary information about >>>>> the coldplug memory for several architectures. x86 being an exception >>>>> because for some reason the reserved memory is not considered memory >>>>> there. The infrastructure for quiering and iterating memory regions is >>>>> already there. We just need to leave out the irrelevant parts, like >>>>> memblock.reserved and allocation funcions. >>>> >>>> I *really* don't want to mess with memblocks on memory hot(un)plug on >>>> x86 and s390x (+other architectures in the future). I also thought about >>>> stopping to create memblocks for hotplugged memory on arm64, by tweaking >>>> pfn_valid() to query memblocks only for early sections. >>>> >>>> If "physmem" is not an option, can we at least introduce something like >>>> ARCH_UPDTAE_MEMBLOCK_ON_HOTPLUG to avoid doing that on x86 and s390x for >>>> now (and later maybe for others)? >>> >>> I have to do more memory hotplug howework to answer that ;-) >>> >>> My general point is that we don't have to reinvent the wheel to have >>> coldplug memory representation, it's already there. We just need a way >>> to use it properly. >> >> Yes, I tend to agree. Details to be clarified :) > > I'm not quite understanding the concern, or requirement about > "updating memblock" in the hotplug path. The routines > memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() and phys_to_target_node() are helpers to > interrogate platform-firmware numa info through a common abstraction. > They place no burden on the memory hotplug code they're just used to > see if a hot-added range lies within an existing node span when > platform-firmware otherwise fails to communicate a node. x86 can > continue to back those helpers with numa_meminfo, arm64 can use a > generic memblock implementation and other archs can follow the arm64 > example if they want better numa answers for drivers. > See memblock_add_node()/memblock_remove() in mm/memory_hotplug.c. I don't want that code be reactivated for x86/s390x. That's all I am saying. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb