Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp1520009ybt; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 08:56:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzDEsbl+4FmdYBdSUz8rnH3fJymQmQWbOjw2yj6TUh9Mx8O3n/RCQ4VIlqojcFR7b7/0rSZ X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c3d7:: with SMTP id l23mr63912928edr.18.1594310175917; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 08:56:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594310175; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aVzvtEBiB4oSnFAfWM2tHIK+Gp2kIe8NCQSG0It+nIoCRx2jUG3J6PQiWtCEeRF9CE xGpkI0AegdQ5fZLI99tn/sSEVW+GhTDQNjUp7N1o6ngdY19OGcRbumvU9pgmu9r5YgXV WfQXurRAlSn9pJEzzjl0s1IL3fL/X0KE79Y+rkeZ33W+WDNBWymOar8NjmlSBpOSrP56 lNKxsNLGxOS1NXETRosBT+mLdDEzqMQTye25Bqi/c5pnQDlXrOvo/+Sz8l//K+VEl7pv NGoS4aisF1MTxE7gnF/7Y/Zc9Lkqs4jk/bf24g53f2CaHdxr9qlMIqmhDI7G2dt0mhw5 GnBg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=ko2toLCZVcB1lleYvRhScChtwEJOK0oSQV22Yurja2Q=; b=LsI/x+aR+DtXvpMaOCLhVh36avRwbZkBQC4n91w8y8KAUFGqjSVSaugJBbpzoqWu0v iVcGFx450Nwbwh2m6nTTC+pzkSAVXjU4lOE0Z+IcPTtH1PCp0cp7CXjOMI4Yk/G9x5bH VCcF6Z+YtPLXKDbJ5tgSBkHZR0JR8eCHPe1MS04X7eKPJ0UWNICTLnR7lokHhypdluRc jKDvlJg4Xi/1IU0LWCo/HTU3yyuhrK5/mw0/BJPLGdvxV5Ij37Re4YeJHgDAvKWsTAwe bpz974FhSGOQFAZZG91VFuDRpHn47MwH9aOgt3Sx2HA5iVT42j7UjSGAM5Aka+EBruyj N/6w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=Uc4CCtML; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x26si2177015ejs.276.2020.07.09.08.55.49; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 08:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=Uc4CCtML; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728057AbgGIPzk (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 9 Jul 2020 11:55:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60156 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727856AbgGIPzj (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2020 11:55:39 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x143.google.com (mail-lf1-x143.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::143]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B0D3C08C5CE for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 08:55:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x143.google.com with SMTP id y13so1436950lfe.9 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 08:55:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=ko2toLCZVcB1lleYvRhScChtwEJOK0oSQV22Yurja2Q=; b=Uc4CCtMLCs3lO9xhdmBONzGWRiRwT9i1ZMePGIYt4l0xaGLYpohw0IerOblGgyhLoW AT5UmJkwwuxoQRcctui1mXrBp211sfFdtr7d5kPb5DLJKl327ienkkdxSaj8OuYdeb0V gD1sYjx5U1/q4X6Lx2NbhLKuVFaBneMzUK5o+BllCwhWYGnXAbgfroWFhQSbqErEmWDK +AP91wv6In/CR0I+dXAnClibT5z9pp3YulfddtucRksexscSOh1ki4NY5LEcEYtJB1y0 5GdX3YRnyOvUjqVkLqhHFf5V1TWpqXAIYide9TRITdEoQ58rlC8+trgvboocTbHdQGcQ dI4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=ko2toLCZVcB1lleYvRhScChtwEJOK0oSQV22Yurja2Q=; b=aziQ2ming0ye4G6TCf9Tq4rgT5qmooXZmqSQWIFIwNwnGi52sZnDqw38zLCp8IUNft thBsMe0ZXLX2YxfZ7IERzWex5MHyvHyhS+R4msIfr5qiG7UTXCg5qmuFQhH7VUBQcOdS GBuxgPGUuEteaE7h2ax5Sh8eWRmKKLjlEzinYbKmCy7J1quOkuzuLewJ/ZYhZF8AVHDY GNa8+BNAFPzCwVemBkgSqGE2S9qqTjC1VUv72pwsqAsXRdgwMoB5o1f8QcT/zhZQvN6p 10a5p7T3T3D1vGj/aUzNtepErdU8Bt9m+I7xDLJDE9xBPwMYgTbVAzukoAA82pAwCdWC XIiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Kgzx4yQNoVOLtVU+jPlbMhQ46ll/ddPddToJQs3LF3Fl9+Juj 7gm88wqFyg/gLXJKavUmugTQ0Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:250:: with SMTP id b16mr39400876lfo.67.1594310137811; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 08:55:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from box.localdomain ([86.57.175.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q21sm933168ljj.67.2020.07.09.08.55.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Jul 2020 08:55:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by box.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD87510222B; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 18:55:38 +0300 (+03) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 18:55:38 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Alex Shi Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, tj@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com, willy@infradead.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, lkp@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 05/21] mm/thp: move lru_add_page_tail func to huge_memory.c Message-ID: <20200709155538.mf3gxutgckz7p67i@box> References: <1594122412-28057-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> <1594122412-28057-6-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> <9fa2cf92-c4a0-02ca-1f02-7ef71952de18@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <9fa2cf92-c4a0-02ca-1f02-7ef71952de18@linux.alibaba.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 08:00:11PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > > > 在 2020/7/7 下午7:46, Alex Shi 写道: > > > > +static void lru_add_page_tail(struct page *page, struct page *page_tail, > > + struct lruvec *lruvec, struct list_head *list) > > +{ > > + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHead(page), page); > > + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageCompound(page_tail), page); > > + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page_tail), page); > > + lockdep_assert_held(&lruvec_pgdat(lruvec)->lru_lock); > > + > > + if (!list) > > + SetPageLRU(page_tail); > > + > > + if (likely(PageLRU(page))) > > + list_add_tail(&page_tail->lru, &page->lru); > > + else if (list) { > > + /* page reclaim is reclaiming a huge page */ > > + get_page(page_tail); > > + list_add_tail(&page_tail->lru, list); > > + } else { > > + /* > > + * Head page has not yet been counted, as an hpage, > > + * so we must account for each subpage individually. > > + * > > + * Put page_tail on the list at the correct position > > + * so they all end up in order. > > + */ > > + add_page_to_lru_list_tail(page_tail, lruvec, > > + page_lru(page_tail)); > > > I missed some points for this function, since in the call chain: > split_huge_page() to lru_add_page_tail, the head page's lru won't be > set when !PageLRU(head). But the other page_tail are add to lru list here > Is it ok for this situation? It doesn't differ from the situation when some pages are isolated from LRU. Tail page has become completely on its own after __split_huge_page_tail() has completed, it's not tied to the head page. -- Kirill A. Shutemov