Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964834AbWEBOFM (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 May 2006 10:05:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964835AbWEBOFL (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 May 2006 10:05:11 -0400 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([205.233.218.70]:55743 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964834AbWEBOFK (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 May 2006 10:05:10 -0400 Subject: Re: PATCH (RFC): Rework the 8250 console fix From: David Woodhouse To: Alan Cox Cc: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1146578983.3519.49.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1146578983.3519.49.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 15:05:02 +0100 Message-Id: <1146578702.17934.3.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 (2.6.1-1.fc5.2.dwmw2.1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by canuck.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 548 Lines: 17 On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 15:09 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > There are two questions that I think make this an RFC not a final > patch > > 1. Should this be pushed up into serial/serial_core.c for all chips. Yes, I think it probably should. It's icky enough that we want one copy of it only. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/