Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp97637ybt; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:33:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPeNBlFRqDjmYunj2c3zB/dJbAjZvH2XfIjFKVkaSia1wXBHJEyB+ql/p9+tjY/4QN5zKP X-Received: by 2002:a50:ee84:: with SMTP id f4mr72537742edr.183.1594337611967; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 16:33:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594337611; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=V4g9kCE1noNSZu1L6TBFgw09wbPpQ9QTmcIHh/9zXDHhBBzLymEJQZU6K567P6bkB9 LqLK2FYE9cN+0obqtGwyus2paxqp7g9J9dc/Zbx4bNTaTDZfB/LYcnBw0kYRhoUJeJxw 6mgSEHCzChCB8lZc/Uzqz4NmaFm+ZQ3c1zzQWjr/6TXZxjIkkGSRU0sAbqRkBiAQAFGR Ei9M2Vdr9Sb3O9BDHOEAo6moKTRsUST368Ds7OtGZn3ldqR4WSV269qJywH0o/aBlrOp 1xn7FghHH65enAFZyafPjhvXbMQg72BGEAbyjUPvvl3/MMQQUU+UNUOhV8RQu3UWvxyX ea5g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=R19xkJ03+gSHYWWIwelIHngewNoGPovoLeEtrjG8ZqI=; b=tzl49P/8u3V08PW7YIX0Smj2ir6ZlIuvS/m2TDphDftVtCW450C/gJJQ2LsjsgCqJO Bb/7CFbwm11PNRmnWUFjX4aaSHGuHB3wu2ABskYefu65bX9psMvR5bHSeCVVhDhTa1ET V6ZeI8RbOgqk3L5b2Zt+Q1QoshEl+R0Guy5yu/eDHSAzWj3IoleHF9hELkFMlbmEUSO6 AeIPM+zIuSDkSXGCb4rvmZlFd68/6/Re899N9r2DLdgfQUbZWTAWO72K/tLAlZY9s4FA qMucTOL2Asbdt0zSB5bAxcoH3ENfr9ODqghc/WRZ3rRRKkHuIRC2T2E0SwCMUac0JpkJ nfZA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s1si2853201edx.297.2020.07.09.16.33.02; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 16:33:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727003AbgGIXa4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 9 Jul 2020 19:30:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46692 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726444AbgGIXaz (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2020 19:30:55 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net (shards.monkeyblade.net [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:9]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EC99C08C5CE; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:30:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f00:477::3d5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1EBD120F93FA; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:30:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 16:30:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20200709.163054.1621115392152399823.davem@davemloft.net> To: mark.tomlinson@alliedtelesis.co.nz Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: Support more than 32 MIFS From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20200709232734.12814-1-mark.tomlinson@alliedtelesis.co.nz> References: <20200709232734.12814-1-mark.tomlinson@alliedtelesis.co.nz> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Thu, 09 Jul 2020 16:30:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Mark Tomlinson Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 11:27:34 +1200 > As background to this patch, we have MAXMIFS set to 1025 in our kernel. This patch is pointless without that adjustment, so it really doesn't belong upstream until you tackle the whole entire problem and therefore make the limit able to be set higher or at run time. I'm not applying this.