Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964864AbWEBPEx (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 May 2006 11:04:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964866AbWEBPEw (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 May 2006 11:04:52 -0400 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:49324 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964864AbWEBPEw (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 May 2006 11:04:52 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: "Martin J. Bligh" Subject: Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 17:03:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton References: <20060419112130.GA22648@elte.hu> <200605020905.29400.ak@suse.de> <44576688.6050607@mbligh.org> In-Reply-To: <44576688.6050607@mbligh.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605021703.37195.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 939 Lines: 25 On Tuesday 02 May 2006 16:02, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > Oh that's a 32bit kernel. I don't think the 32bit NUMA has ever worked > > anywhere but some Summit systems (at least every time I tried it it blew up > > on me and nobody seems to use it regularly). Maybe it would be finally time to mark it > > CONFIG_BROKEN though or just remove it (even by design it doesn't work very well) > > Bollocks. It works fine, On what kind of box? Some summit system, right? > and is tested every single day, on every git > release, and every -mm tree. Well, it doesn't work for Ingo clearly. My own experiences every time I tried it were similar. I think I stand by my original statement. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/