Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp164765ybt; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 18:39:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxBeAlRiSYB1pptOkiqxtrg/0aC1MwzFMIMpHd765PdSbxUuxvUk5payE7BzD8AYb7kvdKs X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d792:: with SMTP id s18mr76518479edq.7.1594345168609; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:39:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594345168; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hD8faFrvqgibwxMpXq6T4MlcJLSvqTAO/uyTa3F8kq3FiomOjIoCm0DAAje7cfIZB9 PWM+0q8NGB7pALQnfqB+Vd6wGzV/R8sD5Rk77NjaGvQjEPmxMRgqAXD+RzjJvm+QgYVl xLEbtXjdB+vP68Dn0trSsWuDC1TKhjz8Gaprs68uw9nB5Nt+Sxab34vv9Zv4L7Ilr9kB /R+2ueWF5vT+9bYw/fmYJ4hqXVfzGF73n3oUWNLqm5Qtn/fN5h0NFWYogjNvZokVxuIF 0Cwiu9k1ZjH+UWP1GJ5Z4tALtVE7tp49TJREj78wTkHcKAC4HQ3i+iPGGHWb1ZZIzqxX 59uQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=rwZ3DYshMM6TxgS7HlmiJMG3O0eqLFDjVA0qiqONL9c=; b=RrFXsn91ZIv6xCG4pOVeV4iTy4PjvIy0DFz8GLaCdzqH5d5VMIw26SIa6YIhHKIMig oPna4MN7WjCR4MpzZ+SzK8pfvnnlX4ohz59t8K59jqQRj36MXSvpVRCj//ecd3YQQu6p E2TR9Z67QYYrrq5jLlYZEEMXMCg6+4qF5XUKcw28OkMmXEYUdtFLkvTMGI1l0BYSUXOA PbJ/hg5mHwXr/Tff14RJcR4ZDnX76Q1mv/2u8FAEKK/qvJtL/A41HKW/fcA1NOG4xGYH 76/Ci9t4uGfAVYwmnNvtOFt9/dVVtlQOkYbTXuMLrL/iDnB50C4RXjkjLPTHsu9AGmuh 1C8Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=kxMyTpnO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n6si2956817ejc.328.2020.07.09.18.39.01; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:39:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=kxMyTpnO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726509AbgGJBis (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 9 Jul 2020 21:38:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38054 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726265AbgGJBis (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2020 21:38:48 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-xe42.google.com (mail-vs1-xe42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A409EC08C5CE for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 18:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vs1-xe42.google.com with SMTP id x205so2136554vsc.11 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:38:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rwZ3DYshMM6TxgS7HlmiJMG3O0eqLFDjVA0qiqONL9c=; b=kxMyTpnOoVqLAx06Eq/BG8dsTt2HetQM+osslhZwLZLc6qwsmlW+bGHiIJ4xrH96dS b8Z4AmXJ6eAlGURzDiRvOaW6caIuXF3dnOU9Me9Ji2G9SrPTWdoTpsd8DSYGzmMWDoCP 9QKK+ffBMstJ7DjkzVsc4yRl/QNqfbFX9q+ZY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rwZ3DYshMM6TxgS7HlmiJMG3O0eqLFDjVA0qiqONL9c=; b=hAgtGDC1MI+iyZYJ3BUBviJPMHWj1JHpCtJJZTOHa7KLI+5V9cRATuLksKWY1BFFI+ 7NQw65J7SFk4aqjv+6JlWX23XoEPG6UOHN904yE2WvnXC7vEvWxN1GXvxqtOlKjbSCqw wUbM1WN46UXcjlC7RvqpWTocUHFCAZQDneXG/VwjZ2z5kpXKJG3BTR2UlO9KaKRyY6C2 iEgOw+36gpb38TSgRPkSRNAtmATAU0a9iablVtf7PmsJxOJb6qycHN4tv5DcaZmpYHdX U0cRp0Y9QbZjhsth4RCZ2MSRxVbvKjr5sg+3KYCu+AKiAVW5nA4L9/sV3Ub8essL62dM s/1w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530+olIjt6p7E+gpGQ87wLdkIUIouQSxHFhRuK5iLWtMj0PGPXG2 2g4ngJ+GQEvLl5vlxN6D0KYznLd+9GA= X-Received: by 2002:a67:1105:: with SMTP id 5mr36484452vsr.174.1594345126195; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:38:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vs1-f51.google.com (mail-vs1-f51.google.com. [209.85.217.51]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t2sm667811vka.28.2020.07.09.18.38.43 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:38:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vs1-f51.google.com with SMTP id b77so2145496vsd.8 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:38:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a67:e046:: with SMTP id n6mr20302730vsl.6.1594345122863; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:38:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191218143416.v3.6.Iaf8d698f4e5253d658ae283d2fd07268076a7c27@changeid> <20200710011935.GA7056@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20200710011935.GA7056@gentoo.org> From: Doug Anderson Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 18:38:31 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Use 18-bit DP if we can To: steev@kali.org Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Andrzej Hajda , David Airlie , Bjorn Andersson , Daniel Vetter , dri-devel , Jeffrey Hugo , Jernej Skrabec , Jonas Karlman , linux-arm-msm , LKML , Neil Armstrong , Rob Clark , Rob Clark , Sean Paul , Steev Klimaszewski Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 6:19 PM Steev Klimaszewski wrote: > > Hi Doug, > > I've been testing 5.8 and linux-next on the Lenovo Yoga C630, and with this patch applied, there is really bad banding on the display. > > I'm really bad at explaining it, but you can see the differences in the following: > > 24bit (pre-5.8) - https://dev.gentoo.org/~steev/files/image0.jpg > > 18bit (5.8/linux-next) - https://dev.gentoo.org/~steev/files/image1.jpg Presumably this means that your panel is defined improperly? If the panel reports that it's a 6 bits per pixel panel but it's actually an 8 bits per pixel panel then you'll run into this problem. I would have to assume you have a bunch of out of tree patches to support your hardware since I don't see any device trees in linuxnext (other than cheza) that use this bridge chip. Otherwise I could try to check and confirm that was the problem. -Doug