Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp213777ybt; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 20:23:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRBVasJOewUP+Aus/iyMVQ08Kw7gy/hDmWtnnDVHO/5ok9kdHuPnaIe97qPZ9jsxHBko4x X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:511:: with SMTP id j17mr57676469eja.434.1594351398730; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 20:23:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594351398; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=sFW5HW4IMB8VEjJDFDoXAPq4kqPsHfPR1jYlGPERX6H/jmZfXqWFcfS308TiGMSwen 5mB8AbAxoN0da0zyGOoyXruOUKTb6Pu2l9rgU1X+owfl8QvQB2fjGWbst06JEygZLy1y RzKClsFEJKbs2yq4tMMf4+wX6ZsHHIUIAkjPJyK2qOiVGHEDY7ys4bRI5n63DpX86/+R VyK9aQMnKuSnLTifyuTkYSHS24QIzOIIug94PImQ9DTmYyKvOSo9opfLKk46QrsIei9g IVGr1PZZIRZGMbRnIs2JNx9CLkQ0Vujqi51epaf8xZeb/JAeEkCmFF7YE72QvINb1K29 wIfA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=1F/M8sTQY28bE1T1W/Z3pMbWTVz2B3L2eqNajIbuqQc=; b=p9+H38VUEiQOMIwQhkIlR97BPGM6ysTIIEitTB/yaq/aOcuPxNjcHB1/SZElH7WpJC /zYDa2brnUYlKmbtr9qCb+4vf1GQyV59ksYjoyBKVdCRDPQW/7vlPTVXnyrtSoYHNuAJ BJbaJQ5Qx6HP4o5AFtEBNNUAT2PSBIsA49ozsWwenq1CGUGK9C3BLZLjUbhrFdd1rn42 Ui6pKQ048/JJ4qeu2nRi4BlWsCJLa2uadqeISiD5r2Oe9PEub2jkyrIu8wUZZB/9OMXR 4rx87jGAu1dOj0gaO8wcG/Bc1ka6LeW73ikXsGo67SoIURj1kOp+tChq4GT28dMPJBi7 WzUg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=RM+jp5A3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bu2si3632952edb.423.2020.07.09.20.22.55; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 20:23:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=RM+jp5A3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726756AbgGJDUh (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 9 Jul 2020 23:20:37 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51762 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726495AbgGJDUh (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2020 23:20:37 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.1.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2130B20657; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 03:20:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1594351236; bh=XReK43l5KBhtSYgtoFBk5br0uXqKW/BoDECZFioWyXY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RM+jp5A3CPHLVfl7472aQS9ZE6OGOxY0fX3HrOCfrYdtoUpJl/KfOIpDOMvbLjR6B USXz7zhntA/C59YAHYW9QpkZSgzGtrt65jttrJmXVpL7Lda75BR+N6CGEoyNQIL07Y Ui63RRoDhUxgfDfYnp5mqhbKHzb8ZHlfnZMT/vxc= Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 20:20:35 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Daeho Jeong Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, kernel-team@android.com, Daeho Jeong Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: change the way of handling range.len in F2FS_IOC_SEC_TRIM_FILE Message-ID: <20200710032035.GB545837@google.com> References: <20200710021505.2405872-1-daeho43@gmail.com> <20200710030246.GA545837@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/10, Daeho Jeong wrote: > 1. The valid data will be within i_size. > 2. All the trim operations will be done in a unit of block, even if > i_size is not aligned with BLKSIZE like the below. > > index = F2FS_BYTES_TO_BLK(range.start); > pg_end = DIV_ROUND_UP(end_addr, F2FS_BLKSIZE); <= BLKSIZE aligned > > Are you worried about the case that sudden power-off occurs while a > file is being truncated? > ex) 1GB file is being truncated to 4KB -> sudden power-off -> > i_size(4KB), i_blocks(maybe somewhere between 4KB and 1GB) Yes. Basically, I believe we can have some data beyond i_size like fsverity. > > 2020년 7월 10일 (금) 오후 12:02, Jaegeuk Kim 님이 작성: > > > > On 07/10, Daeho Jeong wrote: > > > From: Daeho Jeong > > > > > > Changed the way of handling range.len of F2FS_IOC_SEC_TRIM_FILE. > > > 1. Added -1 value support for range.len to signify the end of file. > > > 2. If the end of the range passes over the end of file, it means until > > > the end of file. > > > 3. ignored the case of that range.len is zero to prevent the function > > > from making end_addr zero and triggering different behaviour of > > > the function. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong > > > --- > > > fs/f2fs/file.c | 16 +++++++--------- > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c > > > index 368c80f8e2a1..1c4601f99326 100644 > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c > > > @@ -3813,21 +3813,19 @@ static int f2fs_sec_trim_file(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg) > > > file_start_write(filp); > > > inode_lock(inode); > > > > > > - if (f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode) || f2fs_compressed_file(inode)) { > > > + if (f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode) || f2fs_compressed_file(inode) || > > > + range.start >= inode->i_size) { > > > ret = -EINVAL; > > > goto err; > > > } > > > > > > - if (range.start >= inode->i_size) { > > > - ret = -EINVAL; > > > + if (range.len == 0) > > > goto err; > > > - } > > > > > > - if (inode->i_size - range.start < range.len) { > > > - ret = -E2BIG; > > > - goto err; > > > - } > > > - end_addr = range.start + range.len; > > > + if (range.len == (u64)-1 || inode->i_size - range.start < range.len) > > > + end_addr = inode->i_size; > > > > Hmm, what if there are blocks beyond i_size? Do we need to check i_blocks for > > ending criteria? > > > > > + else > > > + end_addr = range.start + range.len; > > > > > > to_end = (end_addr == inode->i_size); > > > if (!IS_ALIGNED(range.start, F2FS_BLKSIZE) || > > > -- > > > 2.27.0.383.g050319c2ae-goog > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > > > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel