Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp220175ybt; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 20:37:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwebCBFs9lmlDyqMvPzaOTcpNZyi5XYZWdbQ/9MSOxkaiF+MlX8iGC6ak5bEfe4plxI5sHp X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1d3a:: with SMTP id dh26mr57137147edb.349.1594352248620; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 20:37:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594352248; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZXcPg6cxqUQQnA6yCeM9EqG5o1rVZPDgglmkWjKxhEw4fmVQoFUvaahJgnr5zM+eJy GFrOkTq7nS8ltWeiN00q7XgLsowzCGlXx/OTd4gYYp85mUQqLPxbWfyz/q2b1l37Cowi r02bhwo1gNLB1rL8kivjusMlrZvINoOgongl6orOKP8EoFDlKwJb/F2TCc915XUWhTPP 2M6mZHt7oK2e2d5UUSoTHUc3R1W72vy/CB1nwgqmY/s4Upye7O682kzFGTgwsKJxzsLb 3n0G/aejYX+fxnCeN/Pf1pkCEx/1IhoIfJXoHtoOdheadIRrH4wRqatx+5EXcs9F5Dbq b8hw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=BvITmPwz0ZasfxFqr9MziFf5MMG9A+TSVXha3f8gB8E=; b=tB1uArckvKsfAgtHqi44EV4CXLIcz1nD0lodu4jKetOfHbxrt1oKvwwDTQCB8iGrvu fZO5T9TFcQ7SU59St33tzDfD75Vp3biHCJOUKZskuKPn4V32788J2MHfx5wA1utXecDo 8Bzbx8WyjFTVAIARV9fhn8Sys8hHyfPlu4SLuXRMwLmJfhrdYPN0bBoBhxyjHJTz10xq eMugvR036Dhv16RuN3gVbnQiYmX3bp3HDOVfc1UGqX3fvEc0kK/0i8zocR5cuzcZn9Ci o9+GLJHU8Q6nQxIGlltkeNnDxE2Zli5jJmdTRwGkeQmgC08gbOu3CKJxzF1PyOB3e2F6 a0fw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dr2si4004059ejc.18.2020.07.09.20.37.05; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 20:37:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726581AbgGJDgu (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 9 Jul 2020 23:36:50 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:7286 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726495AbgGJDgt (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jul 2020 23:36:49 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 9BB6E95B9EC143D28AEE; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 11:36:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 11:36:44 +0800 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: change the way of handling range.len in F2FS_IOC_SEC_TRIM_FILE To: Jaegeuk Kim CC: Daeho Jeong , Daeho Jeong , , , References: <20200710021505.2405872-1-daeho43@gmail.com> <20200710030246.GA545837@google.com> <62c9dd7a-5d18-8bb6-8e43-c055fcff51cc@huawei.com> <20200710033100.GE545837@google.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 11:36:42 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200710033100.GE545837@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/7/10 11:31, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 07/10, Chao Yu wrote: >> On 2020/7/10 11:02, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>> On 07/10, Daeho Jeong wrote: >>>> From: Daeho Jeong >>>> >>>> Changed the way of handling range.len of F2FS_IOC_SEC_TRIM_FILE. >>>> 1. Added -1 value support for range.len to signify the end of file. >>>> 2. If the end of the range passes over the end of file, it means until >>>> the end of file. >>>> 3. ignored the case of that range.len is zero to prevent the function >>>> from making end_addr zero and triggering different behaviour of >>>> the function. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong >>>> --- >>>> fs/f2fs/file.c | 16 +++++++--------- >>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c >>>> index 368c80f8e2a1..1c4601f99326 100644 >>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c >>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c >>>> @@ -3813,21 +3813,19 @@ static int f2fs_sec_trim_file(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg) >>>> file_start_write(filp); >>>> inode_lock(inode); >>>> >>>> - if (f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode) || f2fs_compressed_file(inode)) { >>>> + if (f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode) || f2fs_compressed_file(inode) || >>>> + range.start >= inode->i_size) { >>>> ret = -EINVAL; >>>> goto err; >>>> } >>>> >>>> - if (range.start >= inode->i_size) { >>>> - ret = -EINVAL; >>>> + if (range.len == 0) >>>> goto err; >>>> - } >>>> >>>> - if (inode->i_size - range.start < range.len) { >>>> - ret = -E2BIG; >>>> - goto err; >>>> - } >>>> - end_addr = range.start + range.len; >>>> + if (range.len == (u64)-1 || inode->i_size - range.start < range.len) >>>> + end_addr = inode->i_size; >> >> We can remove 'range.len == (u64)-1' condition since later condition can cover >> this? >> >>> >>> Hmm, what if there are blocks beyond i_size? Do we need to check i_blocks for >> >> The blocks beyond i_size will never be written, there won't be any valid message >> there, so we don't need to worry about that. > > I don't think we have a way to guarantee the order of i_size and block > allocation in f2fs. See f2fs_write_begin and f2fs_write_end. However, write_begin & write_end are covered by inode_lock, it could not be racy with inode size check in f2fs_sec_trim_file() as it hold inode_lock as well? > >> >> Thanks, >> >>> ending criteria? >>> >>>> + else >>>> + end_addr = range.start + range.len; >>>> >>>> to_end = (end_addr == inode->i_size); >>>> if (!IS_ALIGNED(range.start, F2FS_BLKSIZE) || >>>> -- >>>> 2.27.0.383.g050319c2ae-goog >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list >>>> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list >>> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel >>> . >>> > . >