Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
IronPort-SDR: l9fjHArwszqsaGn3r9+wIPdu85PhiqRIGY4VE9BJHjU1s2kp2McgB/dZHAfGasNRvzNH743Oj6
 gu/p8t+QQ4Aw==
IronPort-SDR: 4aHkhL0w0yOuCrWxuFpni5YCq9aksJvJK62MuowlK8S8jL8LTaItN+0eIApHptMMJXbflEoguA
 W/AH5SXeMSJQ==
Date:   Fri, 10 Jul 2020 11:52:58 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Cc:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@baikalelectronics.ru>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 08/11] dmaengine: dw: Add dummy device_caps callback
Message-ID: <20200710085258.GG3703480@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20200709224550.15539-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
 <20200709224550.15539-9-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
 <20200710085123.GF3703480@smile.fi.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200710085123.GF3703480@smile.fi.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 11:51:23AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 01:45:47AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > Since some DW DMA controllers (like one installed on Baikal-T1 SoC) may
> > have non-uniform DMA capabilities per device channels, let's add
> > the DW DMA specific device_caps callback to expose that specifics up to
> > the DMA consumer. It's a dummy function for now. We'll fill it in with
> > capabilities overrides in the next commits.
> 
> Just a reminder (mainly to Vinod) of my view to this.
> Unneeded churn, should be folded to patch 9.

Sorry, s/9/10/ (also the sign that they should be in one, rather than spread
over the series).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko