Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 10 Jul 2020 12:07:40 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Cc:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        "open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] driver core: add deferring probe reason to
 devices_deferred property
Message-ID: <20200710110740.GB5653@sirena.org.uk>
References: <CGME20200626100110eucas1p2c5b91f2c98a5c6e5739f5af3207d192e@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
 <20200626100103.18879-3-a.hajda@samsung.com>
 <5f159e00-44fd-515b-dd8c-4db9845dc9e6@ti.com>
 <7e3c924b-c025-a829-6868-78e2935c70eb@samsung.com>
 <66faa188-5ef6-d449-07fe-28c8be5e559c@ti.com>
 <21f5ec9c-2d1d-5f28-5aeb-ac0db144a55e@samsung.com>
 <CAKdAkRRLBLCLGH2qhEjaVnt8wNjoyGAfQimNWHZUvzx2m6Mwng@mail.gmail.com>
 <e6057292-39de-831c-0b8d-b3f0b66937dc@samsung.com>
 <20200707041442.GE3273837@dtor-ws>
 <8b228571-d124-e5e2-2f53-57ea4b46b904@samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9zSXsLTf0vkW971A"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8b228571-d124-e5e2-2f53-57ea4b46b904@samsung.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--9zSXsLTf0vkW971A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 09:42:49AM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote:

> But the provider does not know if *get is called in probe context or=20
> not, so it is not able to differentiate it.

> So the whole idea is for me suspicious/wrong. Kind of proof:

> 1. If you insist that provider's EPROBE_ERROR must be always propagated=
=20
> to driver core then.

> 2. You must enforce that resources can be gathered only from probe.

> 3. But this is against current practice, even if majority of drivers=20
> does it from probe, there are many which doesn't.

Those drivers are probably buggy anyway at this point given probe
deferral.

--9zSXsLTf0vkW971A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl8IS/sACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9CDlgf/czDS3TuzSg439iB93bfCxxvcHFqdaQ01xmcPSXS88+JplUZh9Mg0FzK0
5xFnzBmfpIUWbn9/4zRjimnp5qSwljIPBZvIJErny55gneAsZE2e3L78FBMTqz6a
s/l3e09KTuGG1tBfczy/03t6wxe+ks9t95cm6xJpj5qShpq26bVG3rNKB+/vd5us
+xYIqPuomBa8Q9zY8WDQ83p1d5T6x+RH03/fafT82DMwE2pLXz7DT8yWEUpUD7kg
iZA4zesvOMvSrDlTPVbMZjUu/BBlxpNBWpet41UW0dlklaUZCzmuegxOeFE86Zz5
D7yzP9yl92PPggknrdY7qZGrsTKtTg==
=B8/S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9zSXsLTf0vkW971A--