Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp497438ybt; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 05:26:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQIIhTc8a/2FvyL09UK//bFOAqwfUmNbJ84ESYW49NX+pFCcvyAwRtE7G6RXO6T+bwSnjX X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2641:: with SMTP id i1mr55568361ejc.380.1594383979193; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 05:26:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594383979; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LulETJMgVF+H9yiG0GHSPu+chJsA6S8Ib7lkyIqVYcQs7yajI6vK6kpcYLg2uop/vO xBZBXW4WjqKAveVPiXLq8hZ1fuq9XOdznTLYr4hPu5SmnnGjr1zvW39sB1+vH1Vd+ivU DaQSZqMGydSo7GKywP/ycJzHRHvcL6QRC+eF0OvIMLlidTZxoIgbgeus+vcCMFJxUhj5 wu/0/ngipOzG2lYqFxg2cwx4GO/p/1SipojCE+pOmDiJpZVi3IMssgSLHDhlGkanDEfH sGlNN+OcBhXAPnZyuAniO96ZPizSeh7Bkjl3Lx81qk6OBb1sOvvAHWZ0pvD3xM2IGef/ wrlw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:organization:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from :subject:message-id; bh=CWH0EvgYXbXUYdD5mODldaczECfOon7ixHWmRNEc7S4=; b=iBLPD3vHLhmi3ycTYARLjDdZ79UZn4W0WAttxqNfO8M+rgbFXw8oa+vuYFYJhxklYi SjW4kqDsKgJyy4XRnpgUh+xxPncp/6Jdsj4vTq+sqtHx+X+j4eRp+mnSO048MtJ9mBQZ VkwnPQSb2lXYgm224M8k6cuzY2efRMwrdiAGQFC+dMKcK0HH1wT8JBHWnhQ40i2W6A3B I4Tn0ygi6MZj3zA/7SrA9+63SC2rZBIW7XnUhwpUlvmZpF15D4H+oeX/1iF5sZDtMPCQ SqbNLDBRefmU7hhsN9oNWQCT59CoOjBPtz6U4zqSiGY7orcge+T4U96pYaj31FRdAwSY 5VfA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w6si3825283edx.62.2020.07.10.05.25.55; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 05:26:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=collabora.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727107AbgGJMZm (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 10 Jul 2020 08:25:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52960 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726725AbgGJMZl (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2020 08:25:41 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk (bhuna.collabora.co.uk [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e3e3]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ABCEC08C5CE; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 05:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: ezequiel) with ESMTPSA id 4DAE42A698B Message-ID: <05b6cff6ba230c0ab6a562e17926d8503e2dfadd.camel@collabora.com> Subject: Re: [RFC 07/12] media: uapi: h264: Add DPB entry field reference flags From: Ezequiel Garcia To: Boris Brezillon , nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com Cc: Jonas Karlman , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Hans Verkuil , Philipp Zabel , Paul Kocialkowski , "linux-media@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 09:25:29 -0300 In-Reply-To: <20200710140502.627b2b54@collabora.com> References: <20190901124531.23645-1-jonas@kwiboo.se> <233509924f72d69824920d9312373eced68674c0.camel@collabora.com> <20200710101333.05077f18@collabora.com> <6232d8475e169ee53b5864959af21d14bf0fc620.camel@collabora.com> <20200710140502.627b2b54@collabora.com> Organization: Collabora Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.3-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org +Nicolas On Fri, 2020-07-10 at 14:05 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 08:50:28 -0300 > Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > > On Fri, 2020-07-10 at 10:13 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 01:21:07 -0300 > > > Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > > > > > > Hello Jonas, > > > > > > > > In the context of the uAPI cleanup, > > > > I'm revisiting this patch. > > > > > > > > On Sun, 2019-09-01 at 12:45 +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote: > > > > > Add DPB entry flags to help indicate when a reference frame is a field picture > > > > > and how the DPB entry is referenced, top or bottom field or full frame. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman > > > > > --- > > > > > Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst | 12 ++++++++++++ > > > > > include/media/h264-ctrls.h | 4 ++++ > > > > > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst > > > > > index bc5dd8e76567..eb6c32668ad7 100644 > > > > > --- a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst > > > > > @@ -2022,6 +2022,18 @@ enum v4l2_mpeg_video_h264_hierarchical_coding_type - > > > > > * - ``V4L2_H264_DPB_ENTRY_FLAG_LONG_TERM`` > > > > > - 0x00000004 > > > > > - The DPB entry is a long term reference frame > > > > > + * - ``V4L2_H264_DPB_ENTRY_FLAG_FIELD_PICTURE`` > > > > > + - 0x00000008 > > > > > + - The DPB entry is a field picture > > > > > + * - ``V4L2_H264_DPB_ENTRY_FLAG_REF_TOP`` > > > > > + - 0x00000010 > > > > > + - The DPB entry is a top field reference > > > > > + * - ``V4L2_H264_DPB_ENTRY_FLAG_REF_BOTTOM`` > > > > > + - 0x00000020 > > > > > + - The DPB entry is a bottom field reference > > > > > + * - ``V4L2_H264_DPB_ENTRY_FLAG_REF_FRAME`` > > > > > + - 0x00000030 > > > > > + - The DPB entry is a reference frame > > > > > > > > > > ``V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_H264_DECODE_MODE (enum)`` > > > > > Specifies the decoding mode to use. Currently exposes slice-based and > > > > > diff --git a/include/media/h264-ctrls.h b/include/media/h264-ctrls.h > > > > > index e877bf1d537c..76020ebd1e6c 100644 > > > > > --- a/include/media/h264-ctrls.h > > > > > +++ b/include/media/h264-ctrls.h > > > > > @@ -185,6 +185,10 @@ struct v4l2_ctrl_h264_slice_params { > > > > > #define V4L2_H264_DPB_ENTRY_FLAG_VALID 0x01 > > > > > #define V4L2_H264_DPB_ENTRY_FLAG_ACTIVE 0x02 > > > > > #define V4L2_H264_DPB_ENTRY_FLAG_LONG_TERM 0x04 > > > > > +#define V4L2_H264_DPB_ENTRY_FLAG_FIELD_PICTURE 0x08 > > > > > +#define V4L2_H264_DPB_ENTRY_FLAG_REF_TOP 0x10 > > > > > +#define V4L2_H264_DPB_ENTRY_FLAG_REF_BOTTOM 0x20 > > > > > +#define V4L2_H264_DPB_ENTRY_FLAG_REF_FRAME 0x30 > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've been going thru the H264 spec and I'm unsure, > > > > are all these flags semantically needed? > > > > > > > > For instance, if one of REF_BOTTOM or REF_TOP (or both) > > > > are set, doesn't that indicate it's a field picture? > > > > > > > > Or conversely, if neither REF_BOTTOM or REF_TOP are set, > > > > then it's a frame picture? > > > > > > I think that's what I was trying to do here [1] > > > > > > [1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11392095/ > > > > Right. Aren't we missing a DPB_ENTRY_FLAG_TOP_FIELD? > > > > If I understand correctly, the DPB can contain: > > > > * frames (FLAG_FIELD not set) > > * a field pair, with a single field (FLAG_FIELD and either TOP or BOTTOM). > > * a field pair, with boths fields (FLAG_FIELD and both TOP or BOTTOM). > > Well, my understand is that, if the buffer contains both a TOP and > BOTTOM field, it actually becomes a full frame, so you actually have > those cases: > > * FLAG_FIELD not set: this a frame (note that a TOP/BOTTOM field > decoded buffer can become of frame if it's complemented with the > missing field later during the decoding) > * FLAG_FIELD set + BOTTOM_FIELD not set: this is a TOP field > * FLAG_FIELD set + BOTTOM_FIELD set: this is a BOTTOM field > * FLAG_FIELD not set + BOTTOM_FIELD set: invalid combination > > but I might be wrong. Yes, perhaps that's correct. I was trying to think strictly in terms of the H264 semantics, to define a clean interface. From the mpp code, looks like the above is enough for rkvdec (although I haven't done any tests). Ezequiel