Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:37:18 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
To:     =?utf-8?Q?Ond=C5=99ej?= Jirman <megous@megous.com>,
        Frank Lee <frank@allwinnertech.com>, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        wens@csie.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
        gregory.clement@bootlin.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
        jason@lakedaemon.net, maz@kernel.org,
        srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
        anarsoul@gmail.com, tiny.windzz@gmail.com, rui.zhang@intel.com,
        daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, amit.kucheria@verdurent.com,
        lee.jones@linaro.org, p.zabel@pengutronix.de, clabbe@baylibre.com,
        icenowy@aosc.io, stefan@olimex.com, bage@linutronix.de,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        liyong@allwinnertech.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, huangshuosheng@allwinnertech.com,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/16] dt-bindings: pinctrl: sunxi: make gpio banks
 supplies required
Message-ID: <20200710123718.mrvtk6rzkfuno5kn@gilmour.lan>
References: <20200708071942.22595-1-frank@allwinnertech.com>
 <20200708071942.22595-5-frank@allwinnertech.com>
 <20200709171713.tutnlchji4e6i5pv@core.my.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <20200709171713.tutnlchji4e6i5pv@core.my.home>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 07:17:13PM +0200, Ond=C5=99ej Jirman wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 03:19:30PM +0800, Frank Lee wrote:
> > Since we don't really have to care about the existing DT for boards,
> > it would be great to make the gpio banks supplies required.
>=20
> What if the borad doesn't use one of the banks? How would
> I describe such a board if defining supplies for all banks
> is required?

If that case ever comes up, we can always drop the requirement, it's going =
to be backward
compatible.

Maxime