Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp705512ybt; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:13:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7prajvRkjoif0MKcYUgKLCEpoiZalg4QeMvSdsJKUhEuf2c6e6sd0Bs1EWDdhHm7ZdtYj X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2ccf:: with SMTP id r15mr64476714ejr.277.1594401211710; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:13:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594401211; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xgysEm2z7DOy04iYe7DTulHazSTCq6oB/Clg6eQ0ZSBjtQKydfGbe9c3udUuHo/MJv UtAuODxY/5s6zgGGWhRE8/5TeaXt39dI3P2zE99juz9i+bxVV1Xl0mT2e1CTyD0QOJA7 /EEEU4Fn5PMMw8MBFgtmC/8kl5QeuVtN/7NbnraFADhqoPrdtZxR2jEUdinrA0NIvx41 0jv8Nd3isYZufzcHTxCPrwbN4vSkjpQBxW5vlWZTVrjovQEPnbie1uurZdMkIxFQFbXQ VRaF7V9WdAXvesLey0IE04X1qWWOtZsyfpYRSv4Z2Z6ZYHcKhGH2Xcu/cWbivVJN3EvX Jvfw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=O0GkGWYvXWAZ04kdCx1YQGBbwDSBCyaEguKu5oNMmPE=; b=iiaCjBIJDGZlfuZF+sFK/cPLC2vbmaS8owAd+5OQMbFrGro+M/GGYSJ8TJjmWYUIFh qpPDbzH38tbB+bnPUeDrUQh5KWhzc2lT38jkhrAbhqve9wwn+mLMzD/Go6L3tlPRgPqA 448Sn0hQEX9uqwnohcJSDnIoStSxlpYNq2TnFr7tOkIbVbMh6p4jRUvYeUzFoNvqV67H YwkcP4VraZ+tbXLKgVz8qEaKfdyznTbfQzecScoALur/79AOgkvGMbZEC+cdguS5xu1S MeFRxNzvAY7im3mQukohAh/sQxZY5gscVkyGeDqt0aZgwxU+IcG7NJbaduDyK+to53v7 vBpw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="i0TSrts/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i4si4602280edr.244.2020.07.10.10.13.08; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:13:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="i0TSrts/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727863AbgGJRM6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:12:58 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44406 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726925AbgGJRM6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:12:58 -0400 Received: from kernel.org (unknown [87.71.40.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C7D6206F4; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:12:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1594401177; bh=D34QGhVyRFu8Zf5JdTUNPdd+yHAT1ehJ1P5X5ASJ+0Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=i0TSrts/DvZ7fDUKtv84PXSOO90AWm9K5IjwtG41xrIgrzLPePWBvOe5FPFBg98o/ QAAZjIr4tdO6YLQLDMRmJhiXaTcd5JSukiWksC3LLr0o51D/HYhfOzK2e95Ru5EAKc cP7kHeBCZL9NtUHr2XZPwGuK/TaPw34L/eWZfat4= Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 20:12:46 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Hugh Dickins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox , Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , Christopher Lameter , Dave Hansen , Idan Yaniv , James Bottomley , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Peter Zijlstra , "Reshetova, Elena" , Thomas Gleixner , Tycho Andersen , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] mm: make HPAGE_PxD_{SHIFT,MASK,SIZE} always available Message-ID: <20200710171246.GA1944577@kernel.org> References: <20200706172051.19465-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20200706172051.19465-2-rppt@kernel.org> <20200710164037.GA11749@redhat.com> <20200710165746.GO12769@casper.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200710165746.GO12769@casper.infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 05:57:46PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:40:37PM -0400, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > Hello Hugh and Mike, > > > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 10:07:34PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > Adding Andrea to Cc, he's the one who structured it that way, > > > and should be consulted. > > > > > > I'm ambivalent myself. Many's the time I've been irritated by the > > > BUILD_BUG() in HPAGE_etc, and it's responsible for very many #ifdef > > > CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGEs or IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)s > > > that you find uglily scattered around the source. > > > > > > But that's the point of it: it's warning when you write code peculiar > > > to THP, that is going to bloat the build of kernels without any THP. > > > > > > So although I've often been tempted to do as you suggest, I've always > > > ended up respecting Andrea's intention, and worked around it instead > > > (sometimes with #ifdef or IS_ENABLED(), sometimes with > > > PMD_{SHIFT,MASK_SIZE}, sometimes with a local definition). > > > > The only other reasons that comes to mind in addition of optimizing > > the bloat away at build time is to make it easier to identify the THP > > code and to make it explicit that hugetlbfs shouldn't us it or it > > could be wrong on some arches. > > > > However for this case the BUILD_BUG() looks right and this doesn't > > look like a false positive. > > > > This patchset has nothing to do THP, so it'd be more correct to use > > MAX_ORDER whenever the fragmentation is about the buddy (doesn't look > > the case here) or PUD_SIZE/ORDER/PMD_SIZE/ORDER if the objective is > > not to unnecessarily split extra and unrelated hugepud/hugepmds in the > > direct mapping (as in this case). > > > > The real issue exposed by the BUILD_BUG is the lack of PMD_ORDER > > definition and fs/dax.c already run into and it solved it locally in the > > dax.c file: > > > > /* The order of a PMD entry */ > > #define PMD_ORDER (PMD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) > > > > The fact it's not just this patch but also dax.c that run into the > > same issue, makes me think PMD_ORDER should be defined and then you > > can use PMD_* and PUD_* for this non-THP purpose. > > We'll run into some namespace issues. > > arch/arm/kernel/head.S:#define PMD_ORDER 3 > arch/arm/kernel/head.S:#define PMD_ORDER 2 > arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable-32.h:#define PMD_ORDER aieeee_attempt_to_allocate_pmd > arch/mips/include/asm/pgtable-64.h:#define PMD_ORDER 0 > arch/parisc/include/asm/pgtable.h:#define PMD_ORDER 1 /* Number of pages per pmd */ This can be easily solved with, e.g. #define PMD_PAGE_ORDER (PMD_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) or by renaming the current defines to PMD_ALLOC_ORDER. > > Then the question if to remove the BUILD_BUG becomes orthogonal to > > this patchset, but I don't see much value in retaining HPAGE_PMD/PUD_* > > unless the BUILD_BUG is retained too, because this patchset already > > hints that without the BUILD_BUG() the HPAGE_PMD_* definitions would > > likely spill into non THP paths and they would lose also the only > > value left (the ability to localize the THP code paths). So I wouldn't > > be against removing the BUILD_BUG if it's causing maintenance > > overhead, but then I would drop HPAGE_PMD_* too along with it or it > > may just cause confusion. > > btw, using the hpage_ prefix already caused one problem in the hugetlb > code: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20200629185003.97202-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com/ > > I'd suggest we rename these to THP_PMD_* and THP_PUD_* to make it clear > they're only for the THP case. I agree that THP_PMD_* and THP_PUD_* would be less confusing if we are to differentiate THP and non-THP usage of 2nd and 3rd level leaf pages. -- Sincerely yours, Mike.