Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp723902ybt; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:41:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJycmoRFo+zkEp6oNG3TnLVUWH2C8Xrv/LW4Cp6DLjBRwc4J27l4LBnqRZCucADm9yXcVfeW X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c102:: with SMTP id do2mr60261911ejc.126.1594402879366; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:41:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594402879; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=K/bAtMSzujivb/bVkp9BJ41Z0DZcUQXdTExZWmunSMpp7YoJ70kjkaTojP/+7IBeSi G5ehxsn+wpLTdUMyNrIcfZXcO88ADkMTlHC8ZWARuWa8N7YgddkmaaEdvtmS5dQisQjm 5l5nrQxmZoGG1tofbjdb7021Pj97LDTTgiKtqh1oOIRsrH13pIiy046ODyhwRDwHxmtY cYnR4tUaXmljBpickhTQC7VbhK6dS8gjhGwiw4HNsYBLLxqb7aDIQs1DYisaYLJBsMr+ FBTRcEAxl4pi53qjqiA+XGlx/cy0EgwbMGLbicSfy5J7zbrikAV4YX3hveuDWPC/rcS9 aruw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=/IkQPdXSHaUMhvBTo4/ZFo40yEF0ln1C5QCttyzLIBw=; b=RmfMNjbN9PNAfUSwdh3hwsTHaoWar9X+aSLsftQVXzHi+hoQGVLDzP41qXOqEbsR3W WyaDn4eLBMqftEGxuPdiNSMHDqXUuEpPVZAQxMUgMAGTGuN1AAXih3pMxsuuTMLdMy++ trf1RRMWjjZYnV5+fPYUNZvXGvERhrOUxRRFPI2uFKW/1AtPkOa/NMO0Ihe1152fAa+V D5B9RiwpCTSfIA6+QblJQD+UrBkMvuO6TZFXAMGetaPiwnC7t97GZ1CTsOeFWaQA5CTr 5xlpLEA49X35jp7eHG96c8BXR4y8c34ElT5RFoWjSp4anAnDuUNF/SS2d+/PwliDP6Uz /Ipg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ijCxRGKx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d26si4862233ejy.594.2020.07.10.10.40.56; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:41:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ijCxRGKx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728197AbgGJRkP (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:40:15 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:41432 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727065AbgGJRkP (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:40:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1594402814; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/IkQPdXSHaUMhvBTo4/ZFo40yEF0ln1C5QCttyzLIBw=; b=ijCxRGKxqaOvCvELg3qGBYj5m07pSfSDlIxK6ax6CJcl87q51BEJRE/2VolWrpEpDaB31y cJOdUkamApe5IEkdgdQFntsK7X2ilEgIrXQSQ2Ill7jKMz55ETOnli1nvsx8vPP0QJZZeF X3MVsrvKG8vK9nJqCkZAX4XYFYe1PLg= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-58-yu7xFYdIMZat8vc-LrboQg-1; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:40:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yu7xFYdIMZat8vc-LrboQg-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 65so7400518wmd.8 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:40:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/IkQPdXSHaUMhvBTo4/ZFo40yEF0ln1C5QCttyzLIBw=; b=QmwwcVyUrmNGvcMPOa4Fv1AOYa6c3w/j5au5hQ9kpXQdm+tpeY7n4lTNqxFYvaLWkH exlxyNdao/8iakNgtt3FLa/pJMcEQA57gKLczsjWrluiEyWOMZY+Wnli6NLCEmKB6o9b 7J5mPpHOafBQstGJAcbFoD1xVdkoHvKHiF6F7BXI2x0Z5SGaNxbRKngdGNtdmb0G+ZGf 0XTw2YKes6zFmRL8+e+mNMRQyRC7nSZHbmkzyRb3ed3xEn5fdqB4kdj2zrGoE0ElZOUO 0eywZRDoMDp7snKXAU6cqzZF5FDI3yRjbhUKxfPnRgU5v0HtqXKCKZCCtjzB7ff0FuSM 4BmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533paZ/pZr9Jjp+hWeQifsqo4h8Z3M+f377nYQPgtBJGTICwljHK PRGzgoGUnxtbsgc0nx8n+GloA+Azd0+DrgpdyuZVsPNooJ5wZysN9ullfYrlzyVUYKB5wQooM7k aFApsIaxXw4rg3RMWis/ItX5O X-Received: by 2002:adf:f209:: with SMTP id p9mr65624120wro.86.1594402811225; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:40:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:adf:f209:: with SMTP id p9mr65624106wro.86.1594402811022; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:40:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:9541:9439:cb0f:89c? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:9541:9439:cb0f:89c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c15sm10333052wme.23.2020.07.10.10.40.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:40:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: Support guest MAXPHYADDR < host MAXPHYADDR To: Jim Mattson Cc: Mohammed Gamal , kvm list , LKML , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Sean Christopherson , Wanpeng Li , Joerg Roedel References: <20200710154811.418214-1-mgamal@redhat.com> <0c892b1e-6fe6-2aa7-602e-f5fadc54c257@redhat.com> <9e784c62-15ee-63b7-4942-474493bac536@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <5d9e2483-81ba-1d94-5324-08245ced7d0e@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:40:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/07/20 19:26, Jim Mattson wrote: >> Intel only has MAXPHYADDR > 46 on LA57 machines (because in general OSes >> like to have a physical 1:1 map into the kernel part of the virtual >> address space, so having a higher MAXPHYADDR would be of limited use >> with 48-bit linear addresses). > We all know that the direct map is evil. :-) > > Sorry it took me so long to get there. I didn't realize that Linux was > incapable of using more physical memory than it could map into the > kernel's virtual address space. (Wasn't that the whole point of PAE > originally?) Yes, but it's so slow that Linux preferred not to go that way for 64-bit kernels. That said, that justification for MAXPHYADDR==46 came from Intel processor architects, and when they say "OSes" they usually refer to a certain vendor from the Pacific north-west. Paolo