Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965091AbWECFEm (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 01:04:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965089AbWECFEm (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 01:04:42 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com ([64.233.162.197]:17266 "EHLO nz-out-0102.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965091AbWECFEl convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 01:04:41 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GF81rgGqHW0ajsTzDfkXMJEJKKRNK28TeVmAp8D3sccyKnZdZGwp/U0YgAdBZdal0q/x5XqKGqHFMpJwdruWazrz77gkzNbyDxU0Ofj4gnww4nI88IBluW7K3K49VoX/XaLQ/s9vYiBaUSvRRI4TKXUmiGNJ9eOklHClGoJoxPw= Message-ID: <6934efce0605022204n233a6b04u4fafee8e07c0b594@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 22:04:41 -0700 From: "Jared Hulbert" To: "Josh Boyer" Subject: Re: [RFC] Advanced XIP File System Cc: "Arnd Bergmann" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <625fc13d0605021927l30ed3f86v48ad8fec9ec36051@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <6934efce0605021453l31a438c4j7c429e6973ab4546@mail.gmail.com> <200605030200.29141.arnd@arndb.de> <6934efce0605021859u55131e63xd8dab3d4396d7f56@mail.gmail.com> <625fc13d0605021927l30ed3f86v48ad8fec9ec36051@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1107 Lines: 22 > Can you explain a bit more? If you aren't going to use the MTD, why > rely on it at all? I plan to could do 'mount -t axfs /dev/mtdblock2 /mnt/axfs' and use the mtd to get the address to flash from map->cached or maybe mtd->point. Personally I think this is a clean approach to mounting this fs. Right now we do it like linear cramfs 'mount -t cramfs -o physaddr=0xDEADBEEF /dev/null /mnt/axfs' and then map flash ourselves with ioremap(). I'd like to enable a mode like this to in case you don't have MTD. But I prefer the former. > Have you done comparisons vs. squashfs at all? It does better at both > performance and compression that cramfs, so I'm curious. Haven't done any performance testing on squashfs. I did see some compression analysis that basically showed that squashfs did compress better but paid for that flash saving in extra RAM. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/