Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965096AbWECF3v (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 01:29:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965097AbWECF3v (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 01:29:51 -0400 Received: from smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.205]:19539 "HELO smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S965096AbWECF3u (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 01:29:50 -0400 From: David Brownell To: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] New, yet unsupported USB-Ethernet adaptor Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 22:29:47 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: Michael Helmling , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200605022002.15845.supermihi@web.de> <200605021509.17050.david-b@pacbell.net> <200605030706.56908.supermihi@web.de> In-Reply-To: <200605030706.56908.supermihi@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605022229.47937.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1756 Lines: 42 On Tuesday 02 May 2006 10:06 pm, Michael Helmling wrote: > > Was it you who removed the copyrights from the "usbnet" driver and > > changed the author assertion to one "M Subrahmanya Srihdar" ?? > > I'm guessing the latter; the www.moschip.com site implies that > > its engineering HW is in India. > > No, I did not change the code in any way, it is exactly the version they > mailed me. That's what I strongly suspected. > But I don't really understand what you are saying about the usbnet > module. They gave me the sourcecode for a yet not available kernel module > "mcs7830", not usbnet. Or did they just modify usbnet? I don't know enough > about such things to distinguish from both. They just hacked "usbnet". There are huge chunks of code, and comments, that are clearly identical. At least half of the "moschip" driver. > > Either way, blatant plagiarism and theft of copyright is unlikely > > to get into upstream kernels. > > I personally have the feeling that they didn't do this by purpose. They were > very willing to help me with the driver and don't seem to understand much of > kernel development. Anyway, if this IS a copyright violation, they should > really change it quickly. "M Subrahmanya Srihdar" didn't "accidentally" copy the bulk of usbnet, remove all the attributions, and replace them ... not possible. There were certainly a few chip-specific additions of course, right where "usbnet" expects them, but the core driver is obviously all "usbnet" code. - Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/