Received: by 2002:a25:e74b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e72csp815792ybh; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 01:50:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxh8dKDRFQkOXppZrrceYB3x0d7heSt+Miac1WLumUKQZU8gpCSeNgdXLC+GHxhj84mkIh4 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4356:: with SMTP id z22mr57261025ejm.414.1594630209361; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 01:50:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594630209; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DmFAVTDwaZD8N3JGX8+7/NHrS1qs3HkIzbE1ZJaqJZrnrnzKD55iS73iYhfM1IPbKg friW81QIART0ptvw7JGHBw1lbuD2jUDqPsOg10MDkLplWwU+fbvyfrNmIg56tFOZK28n W+QIgEeoBN0oiBbHUWGqdAdcfcbugKO4NAJeQjJNFRq1oiusSvw+jf2jrM0uXCM0gVDT zgxZubl90fshOZKoQyYrjPUDv2mMqS5z2IM5aI63LEKvO3439mxPDW6hIfSR4VTEwT2w nA/2Hnv4F5zA4Fze53nPKcsWhFKdnWMcmYc+xjzY4C27ZMZKjtL+IytEZcqJleFCjQEv kw8Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to :subject; bh=oHZK+bKFQ75lwkcgaMV6IqKKkIgc2pz8wVRbZ5GQ4SQ=; b=U4WdNPkaDgLotecUyPt5q1H+d55ESaNQn5sb0LVJs3Y2s0+pLeL1DMOi1DlmoDFmq+ x12n8VWUFQ+/KditM0r9CeWWpoI60RZyduNs2wMTCQAgADkw4K/LMLd3DXYa350fCxss a7ektqkeBueXZzSmICEjQQmrjkPqN0al5WewG/QKHuODcYO/TO6n+8rPU5HABVO/gSTS 7FSK9IO+k4jtNR/uiCYro3JpkSzrU0wdsPijjZJoEkJVtiEcwBzl5ZgwtuKPzlVnJ+3Y tTdCBABzfHukqTBTwA3QPwi7E7uZ+bgzYBPs3coWYlke0UsokzzifmRx+TNj5CVFklDC s4tA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j12si8903158ejy.723.2020.07.13.01.49.46; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 01:50:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727035AbgGMItm (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 04:49:42 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:7844 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725830AbgGMItl (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 04:49:41 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 0755AD09E27BF9228CF5; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 16:49:35 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.67.76.251) by DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 16:49:27 +0800 Subject: Re: [fs] 936e92b615: unixbench.score 32.3% improvement To: kernel test robot CC: , , "Will Deacon" , Mark Rutland , Peter Zijlstra , Alexander Viro , Boqun Feng , Yuqi Jin , References: <20200708072346.GL3874@shao2-debian> From: Shaokun Zhang Message-ID: <2b5fc62e-0248-e8f5-2aac-7355a2933dcd@hisilicon.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 16:49:27 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200708072346.GL3874@shao2-debian> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.76.251] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi maintainers, This issue is debugged on Huawei Kunpeng 920 which is an ARM64 platform and we also do more tests on x86 platform. Since Rong has also reported the improvement on x86，it seems necessary for us to do it. Any comments on it? Thanks, Shaokun 在 2020/7/8 15:23, kernel test robot 写道: > Greeting, > > FYI, we noticed a 32.3% improvement of unixbench.score due to commit: > > > commit: 936e92b615e212d08eb74951324bef25ba564c34 ("[PATCH RESEND] fs: Move @f_count to different cacheline with @f_mode") > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Shaokun-Zhang/fs-Move-f_count-to-different-cacheline-with-f_mode/20200624-163511 > base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 5e857ce6eae7ca21b2055cca4885545e29228fe2 > > in testcase: unixbench > on test machine: 192 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 9242 CPU @ 2.30GHz with 192G memory > with following parameters: > > runtime: 300s > nr_task: 30% > test: syscall > cpufreq_governor: performance > ucode: 0x5002f01 > > test-description: UnixBench is the original BYTE UNIX benchmark suite aims to test performance of Unix-like system. > test-url: https://github.com/kdlucas/byte-unixbench > > > > > > Details are as below: > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> > > > To reproduce: > > git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git > cd lkp-tests > bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email > bin/lkp run job.yaml > > ========================================================================================= > compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/nr_task/rootfs/runtime/tbox_group/test/testcase/ucode: > gcc-9/performance/x86_64-rhel-7.6/30%/debian-x86_64-20191114.cgz/300s/lkp-csl-2ap3/syscall/unixbench/0x5002f01 > > commit: > 5e857ce6ea ("Merge branch 'hch' (maccess patches from Christoph Hellwig)") > 936e92b615 ("fs: Move @f_count to different cacheline with @f_mode") > > 5e857ce6eae7ca21 936e92b615e212d08eb74951324 > ---------------- --------------------------- > %stddev %change %stddev > \ | \ > 2297 ± 2% +32.3% 3038 unixbench.score > 171.74 +34.8% 231.55 unixbench.time.user_time > 1.366e+09 +32.6% 1.812e+09 unixbench.workload > 26472 ± 6% +1270.0% 362665 ±158% cpuidle.C1.usage > 0.25 ± 2% +0.1 0.33 mpstat.cpu.all.usr% > 8.32 ± 43% +129.7% 19.12 ± 63% sched_debug.cpu.clock.stddev > 8.32 ± 43% +129.7% 19.12 ± 63% sched_debug.cpu.clock_task.stddev > 2100 ± 2% -15.6% 1772 ± 9% sched_debug.cpu.nr_switches.min > 373.34 ± 3% +12.4% 419.48 ± 6% sched_debug.cpu.ttwu_local.stddev > 2740 ± 12% -72.3% 757.75 ±105% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_inactive_anon > 3139 ± 8% -69.9% 946.25 ± 97% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_shmem > 2740 ± 12% -72.3% 757.75 ±105% numa-vmstat.node0.nr_zone_inactive_anon > 373.75 ± 51% +443.3% 2030 ± 26% numa-vmstat.node2.nr_inactive_anon > 496.00 ± 19% +366.1% 2311 ± 29% numa-vmstat.node2.nr_shmem > 373.75 ± 51% +443.3% 2030 ± 26% numa-vmstat.node2.nr_zone_inactive_anon > 13728 ± 13% +148.1% 34056 ± 46% numa-vmstat.node3.nr_active_anon > 78558 +11.3% 87431 ± 6% numa-vmstat.node3.nr_file_pages > 9939 ± 8% +19.7% 11902 ± 13% numa-vmstat.node3.nr_shmem > 13728 ± 13% +148.1% 34056 ± 46% numa-vmstat.node3.nr_zone_active_anon > 11103 ± 13% -71.2% 3201 ± 99% numa-meminfo.node0.Inactive > 10962 ± 12% -72.3% 3032 ±105% numa-meminfo.node0.Inactive(anon) > 8551 ± 31% -29.4% 6034 ± 18% numa-meminfo.node0.Mapped > 12560 ± 8% -69.9% 3786 ± 97% numa-meminfo.node0.Shmem > 1596 ± 51% +415.6% 8230 ± 24% numa-meminfo.node2.Inactive > 1496 ± 51% +442.8% 8122 ± 26% numa-meminfo.node2.Inactive(anon) > 1984 ± 19% +366.1% 9248 ± 29% numa-meminfo.node2.Shmem > 54929 ± 13% +148.0% 136212 ± 46% numa-meminfo.node3.Active > 54929 ± 13% +148.0% 136206 ± 46% numa-meminfo.node3.Active(anon) > 314216 +11.3% 349697 ± 6% numa-meminfo.node3.FilePages > 747907 ± 2% +15.2% 861672 ± 9% numa-meminfo.node3.MemUsed > 39744 ± 8% +19.7% 47580 ± 13% numa-meminfo.node3.Shmem > 13.94 ± 6% -13.9 0.00 perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.dnotify_flush.filp_close.__x64_sys_close.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > 0.00 +0.7 0.66 ± 8% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_umask.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > 31.64 ± 8% +3.4 35.08 ± 5% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__fget_files.ksys_dup.__x64_sys_dup.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > 6.82 ± 8% +5.6 12.41 ± 12% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.fput_many.filp_close.__x64_sys_close.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > 23.54 ± 58% +12.7 36.27 ± 5% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.ksys_dup.__x64_sys_dup.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > 23.54 ± 58% +12.7 36.29 ± 5% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_dup.do_syscall_64.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > 13.98 ± 6% -14.0 0.00 perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.dnotify_flush > 39.81 ± 6% -10.8 28.96 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.filp_close > 40.13 ± 6% -10.7 29.44 ± 9% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_close > 0.15 ± 10% -0.0 0.13 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.scheduler_tick > 0.05 ± 8% +0.0 0.07 ± 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_getuid > 0.10 ± 7% +0.0 0.12 ± 8% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__prepare_exit_to_usermode > 0.44 ± 7% +0.1 0.56 ± 6% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.syscall_return_via_sysret > 31.78 ± 8% +3.4 35.22 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__fget_files > 32.52 ± 8% +3.7 36.27 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ksys_dup > 32.54 ± 8% +3.8 36.30 ± 5% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__x64_sys_dup > 6.86 ± 7% +5.6 12.45 ± 12% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.fput_many > 13.91 ± 6% -13.9 0.00 perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.dnotify_flush > 18.05 ± 5% -1.6 16.41 ± 7% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.filp_close > 0.06 ± 6% +0.0 0.08 ± 8% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__prepare_exit_to_usermode > 0.09 ± 9% +0.0 0.11 ± 7% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.do_syscall_64 > 0.16 ± 9% +0.0 0.20 ± 4% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe > 0.30 ± 8% +0.1 0.36 ± 7% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.entry_SYSCALL_64 > 0.44 ± 7% +0.1 0.56 ± 6% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.syscall_return_via_sysret > 31.61 ± 8% +3.4 35.00 ± 5% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__fget_files > 6.81 ± 7% +5.6 12.38 ± 12% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.fput_many > 36623 ± 3% +11.5% 40822 ± 7% softirqs.CPU100.SCHED > 16499 ± 40% +27.8% 21088 ± 35% softirqs.CPU122.RCU > 16758 ± 41% +30.0% 21781 ± 35% softirqs.CPU126.RCU > 178.25 ± 11% +7718.2% 13936 ±168% softirqs.CPU13.NET_RX > 40883 ± 4% -6.9% 38055 ± 2% softirqs.CPU132.SCHED > 16029 ± 41% +35.9% 21789 ± 33% softirqs.CPU144.RCU > 16220 ± 43% +32.4% 21484 ± 35% softirqs.CPU145.RCU > 16393 ± 39% +29.9% 21301 ± 32% softirqs.CPU146.RCU > 16217 ± 39% +29.8% 21055 ± 35% softirqs.CPU147.RCU > 37011 ± 12% +12.4% 41589 ± 5% softirqs.CPU149.SCHED > 16127 ± 41% +34.5% 21685 ± 34% softirqs.CPU150.RCU > 16131 ± 41% +32.3% 21333 ± 35% softirqs.CPU151.RCU > 16558 ± 37% +28.2% 21230 ± 34% softirqs.CPU152.RCU > 15863 ± 40% +34.1% 21266 ± 32% softirqs.CPU153.RCU > 16044 ± 41% +32.7% 21286 ± 34% softirqs.CPU154.RCU > 16057 ± 40% +34.9% 21658 ± 33% softirqs.CPU155.RCU > 16352 ± 39% +31.0% 21423 ± 33% softirqs.CPU156.RCU > 16006 ± 39% +33.4% 21348 ± 32% softirqs.CPU158.RCU > 16300 ± 41% +32.0% 21521 ± 34% softirqs.CPU161.RCU > 37546 ± 4% +13.5% 42605 ± 3% softirqs.CPU161.SCHED > 16411 ± 41% +33.4% 21894 ± 33% softirqs.CPU162.RCU > 16329 ± 41% +32.9% 21704 ± 35% softirqs.CPU163.RCU > 16517 ± 39% +29.8% 21441 ± 34% softirqs.CPU164.RCU > 16227 ± 41% +32.3% 21471 ± 34% softirqs.CPU165.RCU > 16347 ± 40% +31.4% 21481 ± 35% softirqs.CPU166.RCU > 16360 ± 43% +32.2% 21631 ± 35% softirqs.CPU167.RCU > 36986 +11.3% 41148 ± 6% softirqs.CPU167.SCHED > 16218 ± 44% +34.7% 21843 ± 33% softirqs.CPU189.RCU > 16501 ± 39% +32.0% 21783 ± 33% softirqs.CPU52.RCU > 17101 ± 41% +29.4% 22121 ± 35% softirqs.CPU68.RCU > 1.087e+09 +20.9% 1.314e+09 perf-stat.i.branch-instructions > 19778787 +22.1% 24144895 ± 16% perf-stat.i.branch-misses > 22.88 -17.7% 18.84 ± 2% perf-stat.i.cpi > 1.635e+09 +23.6% 2.021e+09 perf-stat.i.dTLB-loads > 20648 ± 2% +218.4% 65736 ±110% perf-stat.i.dTLB-store-misses > 1.023e+09 +24.8% 1.276e+09 perf-stat.i.dTLB-stores > 78.10 +1.4 79.54 perf-stat.i.iTLB-load-miss-rate% > 16169669 +8.2% 17493234 perf-stat.i.iTLB-load-misses > 5.364e+09 +21.3% 6.507e+09 perf-stat.i.instructions > 369.33 +11.8% 413.03 ± 5% perf-stat.i.instructions-per-iTLB-miss > 0.41 ± 2% +83.3% 0.76 ± 16% perf-stat.i.metric.K/sec > 19.79 +23.2% 24.39 perf-stat.i.metric.M/sec > 4460149 ± 2% -45.1% 2447884 ± 14% perf-stat.i.node-load-misses > 241219 ± 2% -58.8% 99443 ± 47% perf-stat.i.node-loads > 1679821 ± 2% -4.4% 1605611 ± 3% perf-stat.i.node-store-misses > 25.91 -17.6% 21.36 perf-stat.overall.cpi > 82.51 +1.7 84.17 perf-stat.overall.iTLB-load-miss-rate% > 331.21 +12.2% 371.62 perf-stat.overall.instructions-per-iTLB-miss > 0.04 +21.3% 0.05 perf-stat.overall.ipc > 1566 -8.4% 1435 perf-stat.overall.path-length > 1.089e+09 +21.0% 1.318e+09 perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions > 19801099 +21.7% 24102537 ± 15% perf-stat.ps.branch-misses > 1.641e+09 +23.6% 2.028e+09 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-loads > 20512 ± 2% +212.7% 64142 ±109% perf-stat.ps.dTLB-store-misses > 1.027e+09 +24.8% 1.282e+09 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-stores > 16239916 +8.2% 17567773 perf-stat.ps.iTLB-load-misses > 5.378e+09 +21.4% 6.527e+09 perf-stat.ps.instructions > 4485062 ± 2% -45.2% 2458026 ± 14% perf-stat.ps.node-load-misses > 242388 ± 2% -59.0% 99493 ± 47% perf-stat.ps.node-loads > 1689890 ± 2% -4.5% 1614182 ± 3% perf-stat.ps.node-store-misses > 2.139e+12 +21.5% 2.6e+12 perf-stat.total.instructions > 288.00 ± 13% +8910.9% 25951 ±168% interrupts.34:PCI-MSI.524292-edge.eth0-TxRx-3 > 2042 ± 57% +190.2% 5927 ± 26% interrupts.CPU1.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 2042 ± 57% +190.2% 5927 ± 26% interrupts.CPU1.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 3.75 ± 34% +2373.3% 92.75 ±130% interrupts.CPU100.TLB:TLB_shootdowns > 3510 ± 88% -85.1% 522.00 ±124% interrupts.CPU107.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 3510 ± 88% -85.1% 522.00 ±124% interrupts.CPU107.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 3813 ± 74% -73.3% 1018 ±150% interrupts.CPU110.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 3813 ± 74% -73.3% 1018 ±150% interrupts.CPU110.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 4536 ± 51% -97.1% 131.50 ± 8% interrupts.CPU111.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 4536 ± 51% -97.1% 131.50 ± 8% interrupts.CPU111.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 4476 ± 47% -97.5% 113.00 ± 19% interrupts.CPU112.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 4476 ± 47% -97.5% 113.00 ± 19% interrupts.CPU112.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 3522 ± 36% +92.7% 6787 ± 16% interrupts.CPU120.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 3522 ± 36% +92.7% 6787 ± 16% interrupts.CPU120.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 2888 ± 66% +117.5% 6283 ± 21% interrupts.CPU123.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 2888 ± 66% +117.5% 6283 ± 21% interrupts.CPU123.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 3109 ± 61% +132.5% 7230 ± 7% interrupts.CPU124.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 3109 ± 61% +132.5% 7230 ± 7% interrupts.CPU124.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 1067 ± 19% -21.6% 836.50 interrupts.CPU125.CAL:Function_call_interrupts > 288.00 ± 13% +8910.9% 25951 ±168% interrupts.CPU13.34:PCI-MSI.524292-edge.eth0-TxRx-3 > 244.25 ± 96% -95.3% 11.50 ± 95% interrupts.CPU13.TLB:TLB_shootdowns > 2056 ±117% +206.3% 6298 ± 20% interrupts.CPU130.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 2056 ±117% +206.3% 6298 ± 20% interrupts.CPU130.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 831.50 +21.4% 1009 ± 13% interrupts.CPU133.CAL:Function_call_interrupts > 8.00 ± 29% +634.4% 58.75 ±119% interrupts.CPU133.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts > 1629 ±159% +265.3% 5952 ± 29% interrupts.CPU139.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 1629 ±159% +265.3% 5952 ± 29% interrupts.CPU139.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 1660 ±159% +161.0% 4332 ± 61% interrupts.CPU141.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 1660 ±159% +161.0% 4332 ± 61% interrupts.CPU141.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 882.75 ±147% +542.5% 5671 ± 38% interrupts.CPU143.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 882.75 ±147% +542.5% 5671 ± 38% interrupts.CPU143.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 2600 ± 29% +68.8% 4389 ± 47% interrupts.CPU144.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 2600 ± 29% +68.8% 4389 ± 47% interrupts.CPU144.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 1494 ± 20% +91.3% 2859 ± 29% interrupts.CPU147.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 1494 ± 20% +91.3% 2859 ± 29% interrupts.CPU147.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 3657 ± 54% -96.3% 133.75 ± 8% interrupts.CPU15.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 3657 ± 54% -96.3% 133.75 ± 8% interrupts.CPU15.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 5165 ± 40% -97.8% 115.00 ± 26% interrupts.CPU16.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 5165 ± 40% -97.8% 115.00 ± 26% interrupts.CPU16.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 34.00 ±125% -84.6% 5.25 ± 49% interrupts.CPU186.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts > 1033 ± 24% -19.0% 836.75 interrupts.CPU190.CAL:Function_call_interrupts > 68.00 ± 28% +55.5% 105.75 ± 9% interrupts.CPU26.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts > 882.25 ± 4% +6.3% 937.75 ± 7% interrupts.CPU32.CAL:Function_call_interrupts > 139.25 ± 96% -74.0% 36.25 ± 72% interrupts.CPU32.TLB:TLB_shootdowns > 848.25 ±130% +368.9% 3977 ± 56% interrupts.CPU35.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 848.25 ±130% +368.9% 3977 ± 56% interrupts.CPU35.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 958.25 ± 11% -10.6% 856.75 interrupts.CPU36.CAL:Function_call_interrupts > 1903 ± 72% +127.9% 4337 ± 23% interrupts.CPU41.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 1903 ± 72% +127.9% 4337 ± 23% interrupts.CPU41.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 1320 ±158% +245.4% 4560 ± 32% interrupts.CPU47.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts > 1320 ±158% +245.4% 4560 ± 32% interrupts.CPU47.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts > 837.50 +5.2% 881.25 ± 4% interrupts.CPU61.CAL:Function_call_interrupts > 1074 ± 28% -22.1% 836.50 interrupts.CPU69.CAL:Function_call_interrupts > 1042 ± 12% -18.7% 847.50 ± 2% interrupts.CPU86.CAL:Function_call_interrupts > > > > unixbench.score > > 3200 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | O O O | > 3000 |-+ O O O O O O O O O | > | O O O O | > | O | > 2800 |-+ | > | | > 2600 |-+ | > | | > 2400 |-+ | > | +.+.. .+.+..+. +..+. .+. .+. .+..+.+.+..+.+.+. .+.| > |.+.. + .+ +.+..+. + + +. + +. | > 2200 |-+ + + + | > | | > 2000 +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > > unixbench.workload > > 1.9e+09 +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ > | O O O O | > 1.8e+09 |-+ O O O O O O O O | > | O O O O O | > 1.7e+09 |-+ | > | | > 1.6e+09 |-+ | > | | > 1.5e+09 |-+ | > | | > 1.4e+09 |-+ +.+ .+..+.+ +.+. .+.. .+. .+..+. .+. .+.. .| > |.+. .. : + + .+.+.. + + + +.+ + + +.+ | > 1.3e+09 |-+ + : + + + | > | + | > 1.2e+09 +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ > > > [*] bisect-good sample > [O] bisect-bad sample > > > > Disclaimer: > Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided > for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software > design or configuration may affect actual performance. > > > Thanks, > Rong Chen >