Received: by 2002:a25:e74b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e72csp832785ybh; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 02:25:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw9uWK8lK/kjWNYu5HcliA5df0m2gS25eY7VL1OFirry5fCneR5EqEvVy/VM0Eb48Gr+Spb X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c04d:: with SMTP id bm13mr63725109ejb.321.1594632312263; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 02:25:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594632312; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KnKK64SgHLoPiXrzF6Ncn0fbXWMt7ScZTsyrskYFvpx5aedfJRm+iSHxOBs2sjJnYT wr4C3Zw9yZDqryZGs1pL7t0Of101HU1azcPiguRcvMuxeymEMPUoacaQKT9HIwRd+xgM iny00PmWOKAW7gFhLHgmqUmtzIzlJKRkB7qCCRyoX0voOiP20Qq+SLz7R6q7BdBmn8v2 U5zSRYi6HgQhMUuMbJxC2irgymRxmrcCzvGFOU4KdGuJuoYOx1j5xPF6EQCx/z8oPvYo dbq82Wrpn3lRn3yI/ks8zpBNuJAJ1l/4WZl+EHp3tGaw5N/88XBfGFCCkbKx1cltExwu X9VA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id :dkim-signature; bh=sofQEr77nb5Ely19uo5I4O8yF49URxlzQJXvD20UsaM=; b=BNs6IIEq9Qrg1IgQ8Ewvg2vNaSl+qFmy+EobazI/5HzhaeqHmsLGRDcELysEe6+No3 Pd7o8eLp7PWlCjNYzHEjo8oG+oySTVNEtVW8oeQ5WD6VwT9puCeakO+wcLSqTcWbvfHJ XkWAZUb52ChkRpFxb93qTpRDk3oiJRnx3YWti+HG0vpYP2uog9+m+03E450/L2IXb2/J oAdM92DEGx32QO1BKrPOqcBO9+71qeLqvp1p/YRY1LF9TdT44yinRyDWEU8sUTJ5CG7p BlRoXRogQjPHAcNEg8NyyMeRdjJGC7LD4Um5al1MhzU3Nsr5Lq0l3fORB64HsGvyTp0w tixQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=jqjOU+yG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c11si9133131edr.502.2020.07.13.02.24.48; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 02:25:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=jqjOU+yG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729166AbgGMJYD (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 05:24:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37146 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726360AbgGMJYC (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 05:24:02 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x643.google.com (mail-ej1-x643.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::643]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15072C061755; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 02:24:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x643.google.com with SMTP id p20so15820393ejd.13; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 02:24:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sofQEr77nb5Ely19uo5I4O8yF49URxlzQJXvD20UsaM=; b=jqjOU+yGnniOCBRAVDqOKYRcKSkWuB5y2Mg2AReSnpmzCReczYmKiwpFjTQJS4MKCz KTMyOnKxP8KqW/CdAKR/oIgNhgysH4RUeCQZ61SPYzJkqk3N/3S4KGefN8MyyCIvdP04 tOWPtPS6h+hXvFVbo97jkUj/xLdU6++lLAXqJCelAHgxVZk9/WGggx41DKh97u8KoCzg enRUqaaNoKe9lcGGVQk0UGbLlHSdRruopDzvLvGoQuhGDuuj1U855oBDxmtKDSJtrzkb R2qqf82jRmJEUyCjXgipsQ/psyciOeuo3/q1HhNugvp/cggah0XPnmwoA8pQ41B6UwQb sliw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sofQEr77nb5Ely19uo5I4O8yF49URxlzQJXvD20UsaM=; b=Wov0RJDsWTUo57r4E7I5yWwmiFvMgo+jLo5K4LbXLOHYO/Nn5uLrP1iooyJmj3EB9J pbnukd3g26AGGhrUojCMccMVsgJampI6xo5p6ftuO4lzw7YZFgFYoKHHwSyt4RAbD/9l +1zl1bn6u7eE5sxr7DEaO0XBK9IEM2x0gUedb1LBt1ILpfe5O2zVxtkQG03jhLf4lNIH ZxXqY9LPHDrnHr77LlIBjVUqREhslGftujs7jSzS4KIXg8GlQcIQZS4w/9o+Jl9WAqfy iF0IOPy7+5cc/zaE8JPPgKpN4rXzWA+WM9tTk06Tf89sjvJKW8N6B/WeoXe7esMFYjT0 mmpA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530KvDqE8YYcCqKfeJOg23ySSYZefwMrcgOUBCVglh1zwOM/M3kg aSgfrkIHMmjjpTDC8seN5yo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6a4f:: with SMTP id n15mr71246081ejs.378.1594632240598; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 02:24:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ubuntu-laptop ([2a01:598:b890:27f4:19a2:9a9c:4216:daf1]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o17sm9366918ejb.105.2020.07.13.02.23.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 02:24:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <65b3b5bb56d2be8e365aae2163227aac7a71e600.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support From: Bean Huo To: daejun7.park@samsung.com, Bart Van Assche , Avri Altman , "jejb@linux.ibm.com" , "martin.petersen@oracle.com" , "asutoshd@codeaurora.org" , "beanhuo@micron.com" , "stanley.chu@mediatek.com" , "cang@codeaurora.org" , "tomas.winkler@intel.com" Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , ALIM AKHTAR , Sang-yoon Oh , Sung-Jun Park , yongmyung lee , Jinyoung CHOI , Adel Choi , BoRam Shin Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:23:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: <963815509.21594603681971.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2> References: <91dcecde-dd0d-c930-7c45-56ba144e748c@acm.org> <963815509.21593732182531.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2> <231786897.01594251001808.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp1> <336371513.41594280882718.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2> <963815509.21594603681971.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2020-07-13 at 10:27 +0900, Daejun Park wrote: > Hi Bart, > > > > Bart - how do you want to proceed? > > > > Hi Avri and Daejun, > > > > As far as I can see none of the five patches have Reviewed-by tags > > yet. I > > think that Martin expects formal reviews for this patch series from > > one or > > more reviewers who are not colleagues of the author of this patch > > series. > > > > Note: recently I have been more busy than usual, hence the delayed > > reply. > > Thank you for replying to the email even though you are busy. > > Arvi, Bean - if patches looks ok, can this series have your reviewed- > by tag? > > Thanks, > Daejun Hi Daejun I only can give my tested-by tag since I preliminary tested it and it works. However, as I said in the previous email, there is performance downgrade comparing to the direct submission approach, also, we should think about HPB 2.0. Anyway, if Avri wants firstly make this series patch mainlined, performance fixup later, this is fine to me. I can add and fix it later. BTW, you should rebase your this series set patch since there are conflicts with latest Martin' git repo, after that, you can add my tested-by tag. Tested-by: Bean Huo Thanks, Bean