Received: by 2002:a25:e74b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e72csp844213ybh; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 02:47:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz7zF2/dVAaqw19Au1d8lL0W7SyoGcggY8g39aJ/jHtsTJYvOU7xllV1Dbegf8ougvUh582 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:edbb:: with SMTP id sa27mr76808563ejb.438.1594633671680; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 02:47:51 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594633671; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NmbzLQAj+OUJGEDJvogz4zNdywt8jFIGttV83oBEKabls3gHXvgct5hua5pp9vpre6 qE1G9OoHJVGGnmxt2fnKdIplkEjiDopblsLgiaJnZjnLUgUXcr4O4mBXBBq9QjUjsKoO zEsWXdV6LfPbnZGEjwTjQRluX46v7nR8zET2jj5iNMRnY80r1vjD44DkZRyuNmN2t3RK tqIfxeL9eEy0x06jPQP0S/MyL1p8mR8/NVOVrvVCY1aP5l1KYbDNcnpQ+et9WJ5oYOur e8WKzo7lRdzW7LwQkHaaVKfDAZl1RkZHJ/B8/2GM0ntov7Jg991pKoKH6Lubsq3kMuTA lP0g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:message-id:date; bh=vt9RY+Rmp6FmawT7W/1KC3sPl7i5phXuWMzYOk0Wij4=; b=yo+eZk8WWOuShA1GlKqoRYx4V00CXOxLgkiiPVinnI48jvQfj5/bWfZPWzuhsjcAE8 Pyq0W9vr1uWAoRe7Ald4nB8qCAIhMrY+qEf6ozh1DzT0hbPcx2o1re7oySbVqe6kWJxu oTlZIrrsRURibE0V2rE3d+r8quSuzqvek11MKpnk3K9216uNhXgvKG3Ei7dGwr62kYdu 9M+QsKU2zGhmvdQPUVv2hjCw6aV6XGWLD6wUb0IryMh6y0Jprlb0+5xsxzGvY/LQzGxk PWR/tFNC4cvkcNhwqPB8bNCKevCRzwKmYTF1J2prTxSPJfVsDDVNpIKyQ9v5mudETZwQ N7sA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gh11si9243910ejb.442.2020.07.13.02.47.28; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 02:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729445AbgGMJo6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 05:44:58 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56208 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726523AbgGMJo6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 05:44:58 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76429AD45; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 09:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:44:57 +0200 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Julia Lawall Cc: Dan Williams , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , SeongJae Park , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tech-board-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, James Bottomley , Dave Airlie , Christian Brauner , Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v3] CodingStyle: Inclusive Terminology In-Reply-To: References: <159423201991.2466245.8461410729774664077.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/25.3 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:39:56 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2020, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:43:28 +0200, > > Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2020, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 08 Jul 2020 20:14:27 +0200, > > > > Dan Williams wrote: > > > > > > > > > > +Recommended replacements for 'blacklist/whitelist' are: > > > > > + 'denylist / allowlist' > > > > > + 'blocklist / passlist' > > > > > > > > I started looking through the tree now and noticed there are lots of > > > > patterns like "whitelisted" or "blacklisted". How can the words fit > > > > for those? Actually, there are two cases like: > > > > > > > > - Foo is blacklisted > > > > - Allow to load the non-whitelisted cards > > > > > > > > Currently I'm replacing the former with "Foo is in denylist", but not > > > > > > In the denylist? > > > > Not really, only the allowlist exists in this case. > > I'm not sure to understand. in denylist is not grammatical. It needs "a" > or "the". Ah, now I see how I confused you. The two cases I mentioned in the above are completely individual. They were found in two different drivers. I put those just as two distinct examples for the passive form usages. Sorry for unclearness. What I meant about the latter was that "not in allowlist" doesn't mean it being "in denylist". It's simply unknown. Takashi