Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200622120527.690-1-shiju.jose@huawei.com> <20200622120527.690-2-shiju.jose@huawei.com>
 <05c8916f4f85421f871e9cbff112512b@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <05c8916f4f85421f871e9cbff112512b@huawei.com>
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Jul 2020 13:17:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gfpsejvNAOso2ODqLdSBCZFe=mV32BtTr6aZ2-C=X-BA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/2] ACPI / APEI: Add a notifier chain for unknown
 (vendor) CPER records
To:     Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com>
Cc:     "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        "helgaas@kernel.org" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
        "bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
        "james.morse@arm.com" <james.morse@arm.com>,
        "lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
        "tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        "dan.carpenter@oracle.com" <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
        "zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com" <zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com>,
        "andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" 
        <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        "Wangkefeng (OS Kernel Lab)" <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
        "jroedel@suse.de" <jroedel@suse.de>,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
        yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
        tanxiaofei <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:35 AM Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rafael, Hi James,
>
> Can you help to merge this patch because I added and tested all the suggestions from James.

I could apply the [1/2] in principle, but I need an ACK for the [2/2]
from the PCI side.

That said, it looks like the [1/2] is a James' patch that you are
sending with some changes made by you.

In that case the ordering of the S-o-b tags under it should be
different (the S-o-b from James, the what-you-have-change line and the
S-o-b from you) and also the From: tag should point to James.

Thanks!