Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:29:29 +0200
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To:     Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Cc:     Chao Hao <chao.hao@mediatek.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, wsd_upstream@mediatek.com,
        FY Yang <fy.yang@mediatek.com>, TH Yang <th.yang@mediatek.com>,
        ming-fan.chen@mediatek.com, youlin.pei@mediatek.com,
        anan.sun@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] MT6779 IOMMU SUPPORT
Message-ID: <20200713132929.GR27672@8bytes.org>
References: <20200703044127.27438-1-chao.hao@mediatek.com>
 <20200710141349.GJ27672@8bytes.org>
 <1594451493.16172.6.camel@mhfsdcap03>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1594451493.16172.6.camel@mhfsdcap03>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 03:11:33PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> The SMI part always go with the IOMMU, Could you also help apply the
> mt6779 SMI basical part [1][2]. Both has already got reviewed-by from
> Rob and Matthias. and the [3] in that patchset is for performance
> improvement, it's not so necessary, it can be send in another patchset.
> 
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1176833/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1176831/

Okay, applied these two to the arm/mediatek branch.


	Joerg