Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:39:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:39:34 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:36358 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:39:24 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 16:39:58 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Zlatko Calusic Cc: Linus Torvalds , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-mm@kvack.org, lkml Subject: Re: xmm2 - monitor Linux MM active/inactive lists graphically Message-ID: <20011026163958.C3324@suse.de> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 26 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote: > Linus Torvalds writes: > > > On 25 Oct 2001, Zlatko Calusic wrote: > > > > > > Yes, I definitely have DMA turned ON. All parameters are OK. :) > > > > I suspect it may just be that "queue_nr_requests"/"batch_count" is > > different in -ac: what happens if you tweak them to the same values? > > > > Next test: > > block: 1024 slots per queue, batch=341 That's way too much, batch should just stay around 32, that is fine. > Still very spiky, and during the write disk is uncapable of doing any > reads. IOW, no serious application can be started before writing has > finished. Shouldn't we favour reads over writes? Or is it just that > the elevator is not doing its job right, so reads suffer? You are probably just seeing starvation due to the very long queues. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/