Received: by 2002:a25:e74b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e72csp1158897ybh; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:48:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwtmgWJTeMXB+20/VIpB41oa9w7R7Ycz4SGZiE0Erwmev0/iKqKVaZB32V17k5jvFoT/u6e X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:b84:: with SMTP id cf4mr516781edb.21.1594662524808; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:48:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594662524; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RjH9827JsukOQ1E9OEPxhEjZTIMeZlm1XZU5X4PlLXisMKISAgl02ZJkODviOzY6T0 A8wvupgv732A4pWDeMBNVzPuFQRClszZx5YumXk/al5xGNc23xsdjinhN2b669bwUDhL pn8fNLHe3Jx8NX+RleQ+YF44cNgLYH2PErxzO3rwC3sx4gabpGaOcGve0k5FTMuG8VQl Di+m34ZT+KxzgZ5ZXjcuNxS5HokDCeJAtUHxHE7L5UnIThOB7NCPCQ0/J2Unktr2v7+b uejzFEPQM+Rz5Z0s3xYheq28IPdZ+iA3XY2cfvJJeVYZLsgWZVF9XrQy2RUBBxvNFaKn npPg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=GLlOUD2CLPqZ6+gObFxvjLqwxNZcyQF6JXtg2WJHf+w=; b=JbanSzV7cAGlbaAtbSfQNMSspozGje3xZbARMw2OmIK3TquNu4C19s6j/oJyc/PYhh d5nf03jNrCcBfESASl18c9uJVJkc2/7bwgw0nMpBjVsQdnjKgpYQbHCMIDaVBF46AptQ cvzlQvedh+W3IWyuzCOmZQ6b4o4Z0L/PBI9bOyi00/E0kLey1h1dftXRW73VUD3KC3YD 01G89lAvWTvoBrgGULSvgYYGpWP93WPPkzq0c03cQ9K9qMyPOfAdFirtRSWjGJfpYvIY SmQwJRygevXVt23M14pPx9QiTCI7Oz/TrJDUCB5IGsQPVc/ioKdP4OXGp+xS9L8ca9qc LOqw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o10si8637408ejn.140.2020.07.13.10.48.21; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:48:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730569AbgGMRrt (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 13:47:49 -0400 Received: from freki.datenkhaos.de ([81.7.17.101]:40420 "EHLO freki.datenkhaos.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729703AbgGMRrs (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 13:47:48 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 351 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 13:47:47 EDT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freki.datenkhaos.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C692E4F856; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 19:41:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from freki.datenkhaos.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (freki.datenkhaos.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n3DP_HpruE3U; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 19:41:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from latitude (geri.datenkhaos.de [81.7.17.45]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by freki.datenkhaos.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 19:41:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 19:41:48 +0200 From: Johannes Hirte To: Chris Down Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Shahar S Matityahu , Luca Coelho , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: Don't IWL_WARN on FW reconfiguration Message-ID: <20200713174148.GA954244@latitude> References: <20191017144841.GA16393@chrisdown.name> <20191017145321.GA1609@chrisdown.name> <20200713115137.GA1065134@chrisdown.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200713115137.GA1065134@chrisdown.name> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020 Jul 13, Chris Down wrote: > Just to check in again since this is still happening: is this expected? > > I expect that if this is IWL_WARN, it should indicate some unexpected or > non-ideal state, but the card seems to operate just fine afterwards. I'm confused too, cause I'm seeing this on an AC 8260 now, whereas in the past there wasn't such a message. Is this something the user should be aware of? If not, I'm with Chris that this should be silenced. -- Regards, Johannes Hirte