Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965239AbWECQkf (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 12:40:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965240AbWECQke (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 12:40:34 -0400 Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:19377 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965239AbWECQke (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 12:40:34 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 18:40:21 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Grant Coady cc: David Lang , Marcin Hlybin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Open Discussion, kernel in production environment In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <200605012357.48623.marcin.hlybin@swmind.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 672 Lines: 18 >>things are getting better with the distros staying close to the vanilla >>kernel, but my memory is long enough to not really trust them yet ;-) > >But the distro kernel is only there to boot the machine in order to >compile a custom kernel? And for reboot when one's shiny new custom >kernel falls over :o) > The best systems have that 'distro kernel' also replaced, by a self-made 'working' one :> Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/