Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200530221127.459704-1-brgerst@gmail.com> <CAKwvOdn7Ugu_687b9CnOnL8RA9hbi+ONCb10gS=3VqtkTsmduw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKwvOdm4gMe_-DcB_H4mDGm8Yy++_7G20sg9xuZoom-rF2j1Sw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKwvOdmGtZtqF5f-5x0n4GNCWLOnrk2r6e3X2XHGmoOL7f7u0g@mail.gmail.com> <CAHk-=winDAeDTAe33QVoRvTJELMDjQpYPqSPcNwSk+SwPrav=g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=winDAeDTAe33QVoRvTJELMDjQpYPqSPcNwSk+SwPrav=g@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:58:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmsap8iB+H5JXiHYwSJFrtQ_krjNH7eQCGe7p-LjK7ftA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] x86: Clean up percpu operations
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@kernel.org>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
        Dmitry Golovin <dima@golovin.in>,
        Alistair Delva <adelva@google.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:40 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:24 PM Nick Desaulniers
> <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Otherwise, is there any additional feedback on this series or is it good to go?
>
> I've lost sight of the series. I'm sure it is fine, but maybe you can
> resend it to me (in private, if it's already been going out on the
> mailing lists and everybody else is completely fed up with it).

Is there a fast way that maintainters amend ACKs to each commit in a series?

>
> And no, pointing to the "plus this hunk" with a web link isn't what I
> was looking for ;)

So you're not accepting pull requests yet on github? I jest.
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers