Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 14 Jul 2020 08:40:04 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] X32 syscall cleanups
Message-ID: <20200714064004.GA32655@lst.de>
References: <20200616142315.375918-1-brgerst@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200616142315.375918-1-brgerst@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:23:13AM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig uncovered an issue with how we currently handle X32
> syscalls.  Currently, we can only use COMPAT_SYS_DEFINEx() for X32
> specific syscalls.  These changes remove that restriction and allow
> native syscalls.

Did this go anywhere?