Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751380AbWECWt1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 18:49:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751385AbWECWt1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 18:49:27 -0400 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([205.233.218.70]:64433 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751380AbWECWt1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 18:49:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] Advanced XIP File System From: David Woodhouse To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: Jared Hulbert , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <6934efce0605021453l31a438c4j7c429e6973ab4546@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 23:49:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1146696544.20773.70.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 (2.6.1-1.fc5.2.dwmw2.1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by canuck.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 445 Lines: 14 On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 18:38 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > If 2 MB of RAM are cheaper [as you say] than 1 MB of Flash, where's > the advantage when XIP uses more flash? Power consumption. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/