Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
IronPort-SDR: EcITvOj5VfQuIvgfgHsGs3N/s4+JTsHODduuc54jVd5/z9QJOwvUdU+Mi6ouz8kzi/eFi2Iu8V
 vytuiffvqf8A==
IronPort-SDR: vEq2xaUL4KkgSZXXpb1nDACInywqE9LidblzCiR7Zbn6dCU3EYyFwASBbhQvPhA6Kx1vTjAcUL
 nkzpRITO2OFw==
Date:   Tue, 14 Jul 2020 12:56:49 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To:     Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>
Cc:     x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Cedric Xing <cedric.xing@intel.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, asapek@google.com, bp@alien8.de,
        chenalexchen@google.com, conradparker@google.com,
        cyhanish@google.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, haitao.huang@intel.com,
        josh@joshtriplett.org, kai.huang@intel.com, kai.svahn@intel.com,
        kmoy@google.com, ludloff@google.com, luto@kernel.org,
        nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, puiterwijk@redhat.com,
        rientjes@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, yaozhangx@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v35 21/24] x86/vdso: Implement a vDSO for Intel SGX
 enclave call
Message-ID: <20200714095649.GC1442951@linux.intel.com>
References: <20200707033747.142828-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <20200707033747.142828-22-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <dcebec2e-ea46-48ec-e49b-292b10282373@fortanix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <dcebec2e-ea46-48ec-e49b-292b10282373@fortanix.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 09:30:03AM +0200, Jethro Beekman wrote:
> On 2020-07-07 05:37, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> > 
> > An SGX runtime must be aware of the exceptions, which happen inside an
> > enclave. Introduce a vDSO call that wraps EENTER/ERESUME cycle and returns
> > the CPU exception back to the caller exactly when it happens.
> > 
> > Kernel fixups the exception information to RDI, RSI and RDX. The SGX call
> > vDSO handler fills this information to the user provided buffer or
> > alternatively trigger user provided callback at the time of the exception.
> > 
> > The calling convention is custom and does not follow System V x86-64 ABI.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> > Acked-by: Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>
> > Tested-by: Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Cedric Xing <cedric.xing@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Cedric Xing <cedric.xing@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile             |   2 +
> >  arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso.lds.S           |   1 +
> >  arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/enclu.h             |   8 ++
> >  arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sgx.h          |  98 +++++++++++++++++
> >  5 files changed, 240 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S
> >  create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/enclu.h
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile
> > index ebe82b7aecda..f71ad5ebd0c4 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile
> > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ VDSO32-$(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION)	:= y
> >  vobjs-y := vdso-note.o vclock_gettime.o vgetcpu.o
> >  vobjs32-y := vdso32/note.o vdso32/system_call.o vdso32/sigreturn.o
> >  vobjs32-y += vdso32/vclock_gettime.o
> > +vobjs-$(VDSO64-y)		+= vsgx_enter_enclave.o
> >  
> >  # files to link into kernel
> >  obj-y				+= vma.o extable.o
> > @@ -100,6 +101,7 @@ $(vobjs): KBUILD_CFLAGS := $(filter-out $(GCC_PLUGINS_CFLAGS) $(RETPOLINE_CFLAGS
> >  CFLAGS_REMOVE_vclock_gettime.o = -pg
> >  CFLAGS_REMOVE_vdso32/vclock_gettime.o = -pg
> >  CFLAGS_REMOVE_vgetcpu.o = -pg
> > +CFLAGS_REMOVE_vsgx_enter_enclave.o = -pg
> >  
> >  #
> >  # X32 processes use x32 vDSO to access 64bit kernel data.
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso.lds.S b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> > index 36b644e16272..4bf48462fca7 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso.lds.S
> > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ VERSION {
> >  		__vdso_time;
> >  		clock_getres;
> >  		__vdso_clock_getres;
> > +		__vdso_sgx_enter_enclave;
> >  	local: *;
> >  	};
> >  }
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..be7e467e1efb
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vsgx_enter_enclave.S
> > @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/linkage.h>
> > +#include <asm/export.h>
> > +#include <asm/errno.h>
> > +#include <asm/enclu.h>
> > +
> > +#include "extable.h"
> > +
> > +#define EX_LEAF		0*8
> > +#define EX_TRAPNR	0*8+4
> > +#define EX_ERROR_CODE	0*8+6
> > +#define EX_ADDRESS	1*8
> > +
> > +.code64
> > +.section .text, "ax"
> > +
> > +SYM_FUNC_START(__vdso_sgx_enter_enclave)
> > +	/* Prolog */
> > +	.cfi_startproc
> > +	push	%rbp
> > +	.cfi_adjust_cfa_offset	8
> > +	.cfi_rel_offset		%rbp, 0
> > +	mov	%rsp, %rbp
> > +	.cfi_def_cfa_register	%rbp
> > +	push	%rbx
> > +	.cfi_rel_offset		%rbx, -8
> > +
> > +	mov	%ecx, %eax
> > +.Lenter_enclave:
> > +	/* EENTER <= leaf <= ERESUME */
> > +	cmp	$EENTER, %eax
> > +	jb	.Linvalid_leaf
> > +	cmp	$ERESUME, %eax
> > +	ja	.Linvalid_leaf
> > +
> > +	/* Load TCS and AEP */
> > +	mov	0x10(%rbp), %rbx
> > +	lea	.Lasync_exit_pointer(%rip), %rcx
> > +
> > +	/* Single ENCLU serving as both EENTER and AEP (ERESUME) */
> > +.Lasync_exit_pointer:
> > +.Lenclu_eenter_eresume:
> > +	enclu
> 
> After thinking about this some more, I'd like to come back to this
> setup. Prior discussion at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/2/597 . I
> hope I'm not derailing the discussion so much as to delay the patch
> set :(
> 
> I previously mentioned “Userspace may want fine-grained control over
> enclave scheduling” as a reason userspace may want to specify a
> different AEP, but gave a bad example. Here's a better example: If I'm
> running my enclave in an M:N threading model (where M user threads run
> N TCSs, with N > M), an AEX is a good oppurtunity to switch contexts.
> Yes, I could implement this with alarm() or so, but that adds overhead
> while missing out on a lot of opportunities for context switching.

The vDSO interface also provides optional callback. Wonder if that
works for this or can it be refined to work for this?

/Jarkko