Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750785AbWEDAVr (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 20:21:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750787AbWEDAVr (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 20:21:47 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.173]:5080 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750785AbWEDAVq convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 20:21:46 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Tdvtu2j59f8qc5grGU1uLZX78Vd9CbRvp7sGCnQKdG6G74AHUJYjmjdOygnO5VVUQ9KlQ6VXoJbYoGooOiWcnh83etUyPmr0imrBsYJRmzvLA9mrldyoHr55vHluOOUgxioKWtlZCP4AbsJJNVumZ2M81uXceQIgAca0hqrMFCw= Message-ID: <625fc13d0605031721v73cee547l5e067c16f995fd85@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 19:21:45 -0500 From: "Josh Boyer" To: "Jared Hulbert" Subject: Re: [RFC] Advanced XIP File System Cc: "Jan Engelhardt" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <6934efce0605031648k56eafc98heb3070e0296dd357@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <6934efce0605021453l31a438c4j7c429e6973ab4546@mail.gmail.com> <6934efce0605031154l225caee8yc217c6e63c0dd441@mail.gmail.com> <625fc13d0605031617v44c2b278kbf12e00781f55ae6@mail.gmail.com> <6934efce0605031648k56eafc98heb3070e0296dd357@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 913 Lines: 21 On 5/3/06, Jared Hulbert wrote: > > Erm, why was one built on NAND and one on NOR? You're comparing > > apples to oranges now. > > The assumption I'm making is that if you don't use XIP that NAND > becomes an economically attractive and technically feasible option to > store the code. The idea was to dive into the tradeoffs of the > options. It reflects what I believe is the reality of what design > decisions are being looked at by customers of my current employer. > > Comparing apples and oranges is appropriate when one is investigating > spherical fruits :) Heh, ok. That makes sense if you're investigating the economic options. josh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/