Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 14 Jul 2020 15:12:40 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, kernel@pengutronix.de,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Philippe Schenker <philippe.schenker@toradex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 5/5] net: phy: micrel: ksz886x/ksz8081: add
 cabletest support
Message-ID: <20200714131240.GE1140268@lunn.ch>
References: <20200710120851.28984-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
 <20200710120851.28984-6-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
 <20200711182912.GP1014141@lunn.ch>
 <20200713041129.gyoldkmsti4vl4m2@pengutronix.de>
 <20200713151719.GE1078057@lunn.ch>
 <20200714072501.GA5072@pengutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200714072501.GA5072@pengutronix.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> OK. So, i'll cover both errata with separate flags? Set flags in the DSA
> driver and apply workarounds in the PHY. ACK?

Yes. Assume the issues are limited to just the first PHY in this
switch. If there are discrete PHYs with the same issue, we can come up
with a different way to identify them.

     Andrew