Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751409AbWEDGk5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2006 02:40:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751413AbWEDGk5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2006 02:40:57 -0400 Received: from mail-a01.ithnet.com ([217.64.83.96]:40893 "HELO ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751409AbWEDGk4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2006 02:40:56 -0400 X-Sender-Authentication: net64 Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:40:54 +0200 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: Greg KH Cc: stable@kernel.org, ja@ssi.bg, gregkh@suse.de, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [stable] Re: Linux 2.6.16.13 / Problem Message-Id: <20060504084054.fbb0167e.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20060503213408.GA14090@kroah.com> References: <20060502222827.GA29287@kroah.com> <20060503154532.a0963c65.skraw@ithnet.com> <20060503185409.GB10466@kroah.com> <20060503230906.82e0c9f2.skraw@ithnet.com> <20060503213408.GA14090@kroah.com> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1318 Lines: 35 On Wed, 3 May 2006 14:34:08 -0700 Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:09:06PM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > On Wed, 3 May 2006 11:54:09 -0700 > > Greg KH wrote: > > > > > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 03:45:32PM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > > > unfortunately I see some problem regarding 2.6.16.13: > > > > > > Makes sense, as nothing in .13 was for something like this :) > > > > Sorry, didn't get that joke (no native englishman), you may explain in private > > to me having spare time. Do you mean this is a _new_ story completely > > unrelated to .13? > > No, meaning that .13 fixed a totally different problem from what you are > reporting, so it is expected that the same problem you see with .12 is > also in .13. The problem is: I do not see it with .12 (or .11, or .10 (all tested)), but only with .13. So maybe the .13-patch isn't as unrelated as it looks on first sight... (I used merely all 2.6.16.X, downloaded them always as complete archives) -- Regards, Stephan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/