Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751455AbWEDJZK (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2006 05:25:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751457AbWEDJZJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2006 05:25:09 -0400 Received: from 167.imtp.Ilyichevsk.Odessa.UA ([195.66.192.167]:25030 "HELO ilport.com.ua") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751455AbWEDJZI (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2006 05:25:08 -0400 From: Denis Vlasenko To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: www.softpanorama.org: sparc_vs_x86 fun Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 12:24:41 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605041224.41827.vda@ilport.com.ua> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1883 Lines: 45 http://www.softpanorama.org/Articles/Linux_vs_Solaris/sparc_vs_x86.shtml >... >Linux is essentially an OS that flourishes only on Intel. It never achieved >any significant success on RISC architecture although IBM now is trying to >change this situation pushing Linux on PowerPC and potentially cannibalizing >its own AIX sales (at least on low level servers). Actually running several >competing with each other hardware and software offerings is nothing new for >IBM. >Solaris is heterogeneous OS that (unlike Linux) can perform well on two >architectures: UltraSparc and Intel. Actually Linux used to be more >heterogeneous in the past when it supported Alpha. But those days are long >gone. >... Marketspeak, I suppose >5.1. UltraSparc is an expensive but pretty cool CPU :-) >... >* Energy efficiency: it consumes less energy then either Intel or Opteron > and much less then PoewerPC CPUs. I never heard about "then PoewerPC CPUs", must be something new. :) >* Fault tolerance. Sun servers can do amazing things with fauly components. > almost any of them can be switched off. Even low level Sun server like V240 > can survive bam memory chips, onle falty CPU and one burned power supply. > In some somce it is an cheap cluster. >* Cleaner architecture. Being big Endean CPU with RISC instruction set > provides some complier level advantages in comparison with convoluted > instruction set of X86 line. "fauly" components? "bam" memory chips? "onle falty" CPU? "somce"? "complier" level advantages?? That's serious advantage, we definitely don't have those. I don't even know what those things are... ;) -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/