Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   js1304@gmail.com
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@lge.com, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] mm/gup: use a standard migration target allocation callback
Date:   Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:05:29 +0900
Message-Id: <1594789529-6206-4-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
In-Reply-To: <1594789529-6206-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
References: <1594789529-6206-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>

There is a well-defined migration target allocation callback. Use it.

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
---
 mm/gup.c | 54 ++++++------------------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index 4ba822a..628ca4c 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -1608,52 +1608,6 @@ static bool check_dax_vmas(struct vm_area_struct **vmas, long nr_pages)
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CMA
-static struct page *new_non_cma_page(struct page *page, unsigned long private)
-{
-	/*
-	 * We want to make sure we allocate the new page from the same node
-	 * as the source page.
-	 */
-	int nid = page_to_nid(page);
-	/*
-	 * Trying to allocate a page for migration. Ignore allocation
-	 * failure warnings. We don't force __GFP_THISNODE here because
-	 * this node here is the node where we have CMA reservation and
-	 * in some case these nodes will have really less non CMA
-	 * allocation memory.
-	 *
-	 * Note that CMA region is prohibited by allocation scope.
-	 */
-	gfp_t gfp_mask = GFP_USER | __GFP_MOVABLE | __GFP_NOWARN;
-
-	if (PageHighMem(page))
-		gfp_mask |= __GFP_HIGHMEM;
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
-	if (PageHuge(page)) {
-		struct hstate *h = page_hstate(page);
-
-		gfp_mask = htlb_modify_alloc_mask(h, gfp_mask);
-		return alloc_huge_page_nodemask(h, nid, NULL, gfp_mask);
-	}
-#endif
-	if (PageTransHuge(page)) {
-		struct page *thp;
-		/*
-		 * ignore allocation failure warnings
-		 */
-		gfp_t thp_gfpmask = GFP_TRANSHUGE | __GFP_NOWARN;
-
-		thp = __alloc_pages_node(nid, thp_gfpmask, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
-		if (!thp)
-			return NULL;
-		prep_transhuge_page(thp);
-		return thp;
-	}
-
-	return __alloc_pages_node(nid, gfp_mask, 0);
-}
-
 static long check_and_migrate_cma_pages(struct task_struct *tsk,
 					struct mm_struct *mm,
 					unsigned long start,
@@ -1668,6 +1622,10 @@ static long check_and_migrate_cma_pages(struct task_struct *tsk,
 	bool migrate_allow = true;
 	LIST_HEAD(cma_page_list);
 	long ret = nr_pages;
+	struct migration_target_control mtc = {
+		.nid = NUMA_NO_NODE,
+		.gfp_mask = GFP_USER | __GFP_MOVABLE | __GFP_NOWARN,
+	};
 
 check_again:
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_pages;) {
@@ -1713,8 +1671,8 @@ static long check_and_migrate_cma_pages(struct task_struct *tsk,
 		for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++)
 			put_page(pages[i]);
 
-		if (migrate_pages(&cma_page_list, new_non_cma_page,
-				  NULL, 0, MIGRATE_SYNC, MR_CONTIG_RANGE)) {
+		if (migrate_pages(&cma_page_list, alloc_migration_target, NULL,
+			(unsigned long)&mtc, MIGRATE_SYNC, MR_CONTIG_RANGE)) {
 			/*
 			 * some of the pages failed migration. Do get_user_pages
 			 * without migration.
-- 
2.7.4