Received: by 2002:a25:e74b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e72csp216335ybh; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 23:30:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzb5OzNbTQGF0RWASbdNky0surIaf7+1Jvr6plCiZ/PO5+Fxa4KCdzzxg3uVx8qx8IhcG3b X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2e06:: with SMTP id n6mr7648628eji.34.1594794653738; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 23:30:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594794653; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uSzAyKX7zgL0n9gWQZ536s/dY9xo8HsCM0+5YyTTbblmvJ7id/5hOi3GTRLOw7rhEW LRPg65CHvGLXdWckW6NalhQ+bA+YNnP3VgEnVffHH5nGjkuVywsxHhKx+sznlqsxI45M NhA26HaQlk2dfZH2odVVDxLCevJHNebMHS8pXPn1rUFd0C7J8L8lbl1PN0l2tBxTRIHO LRM5CvBrkJMlgPnUmkM5PUFdqVTPuwaxpEpGGbVFetm++CLs1aMfWhgr0cSoXKCAehZH 9VKOLF7KcKSqx6fc4UxD/i1d/PA0egEl7P1Gd1l8szAMACup2M+raGjSsJJeYeA4Ipfp Z5oA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=e5FJGmQ6vQLhbzVh6GEQYwJjVzQkpDIcYGjeZ9xtCLY=; b=oYl77djsqFmoOzj3ylMSA9g3HgEE67314+PYrReE9QWQVJ1ShrYpObLaA7N81ZBeLu oPOB9gvbIqpEcyBn38ZGfZplnRz60B9t24HJHgcO84/wEEhaNG3/MMs7Vv5w9ruOpCW1 ce2HUxqt9RwKylzzO4VfJ9rACxcLz1OYcC6nBQzE8W/t0NI4JE+WgTNrTEQrHEGR2h9K cUaMWhHRvnsY5KiXvIyKJRx+y5C7UvLkacOK6uniLpYHIl5alyEXMHuJ0hEquXSal8jV o6r/hMUZaKcKV7JbJTrJj9J5SVpUs5nhNfr0ZERKsc6kjVTUomNuePEO1/jpeuMhJjKR 1DIA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b15si926277edz.588.2020.07.14.23.30.29; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 23:30:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725912AbgGOGXu (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 02:23:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32780 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725850AbgGOGXt (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 02:23:49 -0400 Received: from trent.utfs.org (trent.utfs.org [IPv6:2a03:3680:0:3::67]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A393AC061794 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2020 23:23:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by trent.utfs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D15FC602BC; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 08:23:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 23:23:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Christian Kujau To: Jonathan Corbet cc: "Alexander A. Klimov" , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, ribalda@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, mchehab+samsung@kernel.org, luis.f.correia@gmail.com, geert+renesas@glider.be, paulburton@kernel.org, cyphar@cyphar.com, martink@posteo.de, davej@codemonkey.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] CREDITS: remove link http://www.dementia.org/~shadow In-Reply-To: <20200714154708.71b3efe2@lwn.net> Message-ID: References: <20200713114321.783f0ae6@lwn.net> <20200714193805.49746-1-grandmaster@al2klimov.de> <20200714154708.71b3efe2@lwn.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.22.1 (DEB 446 2020-06-13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 14 Jul 2020, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > N: Derrick J. Brashear > > E: shadow@dementia.org > > -W: http://www.dementia.org/~shadow That particular entry moved to: W: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~shadow/ (The https version only supports TLSv1, and Firefox balks) Otherwise, what Jon said: > So thanks for addressing these. That said, I do wonder if this is quite > the right thing to do. I'm assuming that the old sites still exist in the > wayback machine somewhere, and somebody might actually want to find them. > Pity the poor anthropologist researching the origins of the the > billion-line, free-software kernels widely used in the 2500's... > > So maybe we should either mark it as "[BROKEN]" or make a direct link into > the wayback machine instead? That would enable the suitably motivated to > go after the content that once existed. As an innocent bystander, I'd opt for [BROKEN] tags, or Wayback machine substitutes, instead of just removing those entries. My 2 cents, Christian. -- BOFH excuse #128: Power Company having EMP problems with their reactor