Received: by 2002:a25:e74b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e72csp374360ybh; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 04:25:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzjZBTuXsS8eut8QrQ7wnYMR/ZAawHtl2x0vM5RDE14gPw1DJXirtCUo6HjUDw9+YNtft6f X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3b01:: with SMTP id g1mr9235908ejf.353.1594812344160; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 04:25:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594812344; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=djWWTT/e5Jm+virWIjbdq8SgtaoJ3QBS7TMu3Q0+mTr+3YBR7rp5ws537838VjjW9C 52XUH7pdoXnk/23BAvH80YW1p45Q4eg0kzJC3NiXNU7MZ+d0FzEqubKMoD4dHD6IAcci m7AqxzKBXzGkUv99YcTDcZAvQBwtzGfgFyjEvadoLkiuepHwe/QUj/1LrglYp2gk6Te+ dtMvKLSBePp+yf4TM5aEyNJlDjlKo3pFunPxC4xPOip/dCulpD2WI8akBEBMz86IraNn kiHrynBr2yrn67EmGaRfa3yDaCo5SjYbSi2M+Xxk9+B7oI2bn2bJYs9BXIX/+K+0dK3I xZnw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=qMUY6llyiVBHai5nrhOTf3JZHya8KtMcnB9MpKaEZPI=; b=FmHdzdkc1YtvW6cduKtAzmalCNm3gdjB1r1Fs/f+uX/mVI52JDC10mq5b/2z3CioAD 5qphWFucs9UMni3CFo5gcZuPG1hcrnWSQwdSx72JXD6Wwbt+HbVwWbqj4cfYMEQqxFT0 Ue3ovKSoXpLrcwn7akbhyHgLsEgcQG3FNeHzf35MaJHzfO8UrAoP/Cauj5QvhK/ghuEO DpYIKuVzi5xHuJkgQ8HKnqQyOtKd7i6vi26Odgy26R/6/9/zv+IknGhnp0sfphtmiHD9 SbMiv9GY9k4dWza5T7SeaXhksG8OVgzLhSwmfJ5FEya3qEqgf1/S1ozzL6rwi3SXmyoY Cn6w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=o3SVj6Bl; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ot18si1007511ejb.303.2020.07.15.04.25.18; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 04:25:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=o3SVj6Bl; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731160AbgGOKeK (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 06:34:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43364 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726437AbgGOKeJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 06:34:09 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x443.google.com (mail-wr1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::443]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10C43C061755; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 03:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x443.google.com with SMTP id z15so1992928wrl.8; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 03:34:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qMUY6llyiVBHai5nrhOTf3JZHya8KtMcnB9MpKaEZPI=; b=o3SVj6BlSqIoxI/NdTPa8Rna1RspumQOntproHK00T8T/pG7cJIaYWI0Sp8ez2F8Tx mKAwnghTbCuPG6kgc3nedbXtGNrsg+CaO51/WYI8kUWOFv/ftCDl23egIkksWNFuD8bf QdPklSuM/NcikmyFKYr6f0GWhhvGAvZaeZNEBvGcPO/LWKWR3t37kDm02nAbwes/NF0g uZGbFvgg4ICoypiqeavzk+s8shdUUnLICqqLej68j/1cp/Ly85BbGYpWYKZxrcxOQhdM gzQ52xoNEl6mAyv0DbZePFoVA5ZjJgCUadRTzKAmFitC23HQPIweoc/OmKmwM6VnDyNC CP0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qMUY6llyiVBHai5nrhOTf3JZHya8KtMcnB9MpKaEZPI=; b=M+AMkYjd65a+TYKYodTia7Cgf9Qj14OjUBU6RkitzifVb9iBhdT0BQgqHd+lMHbtmv jQgsvbXGdlJrcdC/abYrYOoB4nLJR9CPtHCXG8KoUWEdVWl3/sSp/v4QmiiD9g8H0S7Y iNGqwJAy5coZtmCulsJ6ul7yX7acROEE5NQPVABPLGOvHRUh5XCNvz1AdGIYX2MYKMpg TWXdSZlmtN/MRgd2NMicCZtttKmkoauOMsfXI+9HHOQPr3ZSB5f/lX3NtaFv79MEwvzm X0iHF/yj2GgudPWkImTdxiRizSU6NjIOejEfmbZsvObTyjMzDXW0Ql3gXluhheurPWHS P45A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531QmAPEBO8dqJOIL31d2ltSp4hk6n/g1hpUwSmWo/61e89gqq0+ b5Rc1t2dSPz0dmLhpirPR+P5yQisL4eBAHDYkPVccIjP X-Received: by 2002:adf:e850:: with SMTP id d16mr10941653wrn.426.1594809247738; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 03:34:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200715095518.3724-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200715095518.3724-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com> From: Ming Lei Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 18:33:56 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: check host supplied logical block size To: Maxim Levitsky Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jens Axboe , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "open list:VIRTIO CORE AND NET DRIVERS" , "open list:BLOCK LAYER" , Stefan Hajnoczi , Paolo Bonzini Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:55 PM Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > Linux kernel only supports logical block sizes which are power of two, > at least 512 bytes and no more that PAGE_SIZE. > > Check this instead of crashing later on. > > Note that there is no need to check physical block size since it is > only a hint, and virtio-blk already only supports power of two values. > > Bugzilla link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664619 > > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky > --- > drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > index 980df853ee497..36dda31cc4e96 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > +++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c > @@ -681,6 +681,12 @@ static const struct blk_mq_ops virtio_mq_ops = { > static unsigned int virtblk_queue_depth; > module_param_named(queue_depth, virtblk_queue_depth, uint, 0444); > > + > +static bool virtblk_valid_block_size(unsigned int blksize) > +{ > + return blksize >= 512 && blksize <= PAGE_SIZE && is_power_of_2(blksize); > +} > + > static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > { > struct virtio_blk *vblk; > @@ -809,9 +815,16 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > err = virtio_cread_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE, > struct virtio_blk_config, blk_size, > &blk_size); > - if (!err) > + if (!err) { > + if (!virtblk_valid_block_size(blk_size)) { > + dev_err(&vdev->dev, > + "%s failure: unsupported logical block size %d\n", > + __func__, blk_size); > + err = -EINVAL; > + goto out_cleanup_queue; > + } > blk_queue_logical_block_size(q, blk_size); > - else > + } else > blk_size = queue_logical_block_size(q); > > /* Use topology information if available */ > @@ -872,6 +885,9 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > device_add_disk(&vdev->dev, vblk->disk, virtblk_attr_groups); > return 0; > > +out_cleanup_queue: > + blk_cleanup_queue(vblk->disk->queue); > + vblk->disk->queue = NULL; > out_free_tags: > blk_mq_free_tag_set(&vblk->tag_set); > out_put_disk: > -- > 2.26.2 > > _______________________________________________ > Virtualization mailing list > Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization Looks fine, Reviewed-by: Ming Lei -- Ming Lei