Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
IronPort-SDR: ViUFu9WFGhwE9g7juizxJ6T7yuXVEYnfiqsGkltEd2s7kBf2xIUKUDKH7kFUJ1ImoEHSyimq26
 fTueqBKHmkx54rWzfv0Zjqo3dqHVZta3HZnd8eMmFghqnnkZJoQUBs4EulVWh/4zV7oYm0bXqj
 LC2iqOhIw++KzFg7AnEIcb3L4xQs5uxnnsV+EDCzWFwiZUl1u4wCw43anLlB2Ert/KOlL90BVa
 07i93OT51NnaE7atMqOcdjtnb7MJOO0yFCZ+ZMpZ0ruROSAmf8YcxClidO0UnFm2UapvzgIKjf
 ESs=
From:   Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
To:     <mturquette@baylibre.com>, <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>
CC:     <bbrezillon@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "Claudiu Beznea" <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/19] clk: at91: sam9x60-pll: use frac when computing pll frequency
Date:   Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:24:12 +0300
Message-ID: <1594812267-6697-5-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
In-Reply-To: <1594812267-6697-1-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
References: <1594812267-6697-1-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

According to datasheet the PLL frequency is computed using the following
formula: parent_rate * (mul + 1 + frac/2^22)/(div + 1). Use this
formula.

Fixes: a436c2a447e59 ("clk: at91: add sam9x60 PLL driver")
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
---
 drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
index 3522eae2edd6..d3152c0afcbf 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-sam9x60-pll.c
@@ -152,7 +152,8 @@ static unsigned long sam9x60_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 {
 	struct sam9x60_pll *pll = to_sam9x60_pll(hw);
 
-	return (parent_rate * (pll->mul + 1)) / (pll->div + 1);
+	return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((parent_rate * (pll->mul + 1) +
+		((u64)parent_rate * pll->frac >> 22)), (pll->div + 1));
 }
 
 static long sam9x60_pll_get_best_div_mul(struct sam9x60_pll *pll,
-- 
2.7.4